43a9c73556
Fixes typo "reflexivitiy" to "reflexivity", and changes exact Eq.rfl to exact rfl, since Eq.rfl does not exist. (I got something confused wrt the bot message on #4367 and accidentally closed that one, so making this one instead, which I think satisfies the requirements it wanted.) --------- Co-authored-by: Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de>
45 lines
2.2 KiB
Text
45 lines
2.2 KiB
Text
runTacticMustCatchExceptions.lean:2:25-2:28: error: The rfl tactic failed. Possible reasons:
|
|
- The goal is not a reflexive relation (neither `=` nor a relation with a @[refl] lemma).
|
|
- The arguments of the relation are not equal.
|
|
Try using the reflexivity lemma for your relation explicitly, e.g. `exact Eq.refl _` or
|
|
`exact HEq.rfl` etc.
|
|
a b : Nat
|
|
⊢ 1 ≤ a + b
|
|
runTacticMustCatchExceptions.lean:3:25-3:28: error: The rfl tactic failed. Possible reasons:
|
|
- The goal is not a reflexive relation (neither `=` nor a relation with a @[refl] lemma).
|
|
- The arguments of the relation are not equal.
|
|
Try using the reflexivity lemma for your relation explicitly, e.g. `exact Eq.refl _` or
|
|
`exact HEq.rfl` etc.
|
|
a b : Nat
|
|
this : 1 ≤ a + b
|
|
⊢ a + b ≤ b
|
|
runTacticMustCatchExceptions.lean:4:25-4:28: error: The rfl tactic failed. Possible reasons:
|
|
- The goal is not a reflexive relation (neither `=` nor a relation with a @[refl] lemma).
|
|
- The arguments of the relation are not equal.
|
|
Try using the reflexivity lemma for your relation explicitly, e.g. `exact Eq.refl _` or
|
|
`exact HEq.rfl` etc.
|
|
a b : Nat
|
|
this✝ : 1 ≤ a + b
|
|
this : a + b ≤ b
|
|
⊢ b ≤ 2
|
|
runTacticMustCatchExceptions.lean:9:18-9:21: error: The rfl tactic failed. Possible reasons:
|
|
- The goal is not a reflexive relation (neither `=` nor a relation with a @[refl] lemma).
|
|
- The arguments of the relation are not equal.
|
|
Try using the reflexivity lemma for your relation explicitly, e.g. `exact Eq.refl _` or
|
|
`exact HEq.rfl` etc.
|
|
a b : Nat
|
|
⊢ 1 ≤ a + b
|
|
runTacticMustCatchExceptions.lean:10:14-10:17: error: The rfl tactic failed. Possible reasons:
|
|
- The goal is not a reflexive relation (neither `=` nor a relation with a @[refl] lemma).
|
|
- The arguments of the relation are not equal.
|
|
Try using the reflexivity lemma for your relation explicitly, e.g. `exact Eq.refl _` or
|
|
`exact HEq.rfl` etc.
|
|
a b : Nat
|
|
⊢ a + b ≤ b
|
|
runTacticMustCatchExceptions.lean:11:14-11:17: error: The rfl tactic failed. Possible reasons:
|
|
- The goal is not a reflexive relation (neither `=` nor a relation with a @[refl] lemma).
|
|
- The arguments of the relation are not equal.
|
|
Try using the reflexivity lemma for your relation explicitly, e.g. `exact Eq.refl _` or
|
|
`exact HEq.rfl` etc.
|
|
a b : Nat
|
|
⊢ b ≤ 2
|