lean4-htt/tests/lean/run/grind_pre.lean
Leonardo de Moura 05aa256c99
feat: model construction for offset constraints (#6636)
This PR implements model construction for offset constraints in the
`grind` tactic.
2025-01-14 03:28:58 +00:00

203 lines
4.2 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

abbrev f (a : α) := a
set_option grind.debug true
set_option grind.debug.proofs true
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind.1.2
a b c : Bool
p q : Prop
left✝ : a = true
left : p
right : q
h✝ : b = false
h : c = true
⊢ False[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] a = true
[prop] b = true c = true
[prop] p
[prop] q
[prop] b = false a = false
[prop] b = false
[prop] c = true[eqc] True propositions
[prop] b = true c = true
[prop] p
[prop] q
[prop] b = false a = false
[prop] b = false
[prop] c = true[eqc] Equivalence classes
[eqc] {b = true, a = false}
[eqc] {b, false}
[eqc] {a, c, true}
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
theorem ex (h : (f a && (b || f (f c))) = true) (h' : p ∧ q) : b && a := by
grind
open Lean.Grind.Eager in
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind.2.1
a b c : Bool
p q : Prop
left✝ : a = true
h✝ : c = true
left : p
right : q
h : b = false
⊢ False[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] a = true
[prop] c = true
[prop] p
[prop] q
[prop] b = false[eqc] True propositions
[prop] p
[prop] q[eqc] Equivalence classes
[eqc] {b, false}
[eqc] {a, c, true}
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
theorem ex2 (h : (f a && (b || f (f c))) = true) (h' : p ∧ q) : b && a := by
grind
def g (i : Nat) (j : Nat) (_ : i > j := by omega) := i + j
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind
i j : Nat
h : j + 1 < i + 1
h✝ : j + 1 ≤ i
x✝ : ¬g (i + 1) j ⋯ = i + j + 1
⊢ False[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] j + 1 ≤ i
[prop] ¬g (i + 1) j ⋯ = i + j + 1[eqc] True propositions
[prop] j + 1 ≤ i[eqc] False propositions
[prop] g (i + 1) j ⋯ = i + j + 1[offset] Assignment satisfying offset contraints
[assign] j := 0
[assign] i := 1
[assign] g (i + 1) j ⋯ := 0
[assign] i + j := 0
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
example (i j : Nat) (h : i + 1 > j + 1) : g (i+1) j = f ((fun x => x) i) + f j + 1 := by
grind
structure Point where
x : Nat
y : Int
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind
a₁ : Point
a₂ : Nat
a₃ : Int
as : List Point
b₁ : Point
bs : List Point
b₂ : Nat
b₃ : Int
head_eq : a₁ = b₁
x_eq : a₂ = b₂
y_eq : a₃ = b₃
tail_eq : as = bs
⊢ False[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] a₁ = b₁
[prop] a₂ = b₂
[prop] a₃ = b₃
[prop] as = bs[eqc] Equivalence classes
[eqc] {as, bs}
[eqc] {a₃, b₃}
[eqc] {a₂, b₂}
[eqc] {a₁, b₁}
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
theorem ex3 (h : a₁ :: { x := a₂, y := a₃ : Point } :: as = b₁ :: { x := b₂, y := b₃} :: bs) : False := by
grind
def h (a : α) := a
example (p : Prop) (a b c : Nat) : p → a = 0 → a = b → h a = h c → a = c ∧ c = a → a = b ∧ b = a → a = c := by
grind
set_option trace.grind.debug.proof true
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind.1
α : Type
a : α
p q r : Prop
h₁ : HEq p a
h₂ : HEq q a
h₃ : p = r
left : ¬p r
h : ¬r
⊢ False[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] HEq p a
[prop] HEq q a
[prop] p = r
[prop] ¬p r
[prop] ¬r p
[prop] ¬r[eqc] True propositions
[prop] p = r
[prop] ¬p r
[prop] ¬r p
[prop] ¬p
[prop] ¬r[eqc] False propositions
[prop] a
[prop] p
[prop] q
[prop] r
case grind.2
α : Type
a : α
p q r : Prop
h₁ : HEq p a
h₂ : HEq q a
h₃ : p = r
left : ¬p r
h : p
⊢ False[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] HEq p a
[prop] HEq q a
[prop] p = r
[prop] ¬p r
[prop] ¬r p
[prop] p[eqc] True propositions
[prop] p = r
[prop] ¬p r
[prop] ¬r p
[prop] a
[prop] p
[prop] q
[prop] r[eqc] False propositions
[prop] ¬p
[prop] ¬r
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
example (a : α) (p q r : Prop) : (h₁ : HEq p a) → (h₂ : HEq q a) → (h₃ : p = r) → False := by
grind
example (a b : Nat) (f : Nat → Nat) : (h₁ : a = b) → (h₂ : f a ≠ f b) → False := by
grind
example (a : α) (p q r : Prop) : (h₁ : HEq p a) → (h₂ : HEq q a) → (h₃ : p = r) → q = r := by
grind
/--
warning: declaration uses 'sorry'
---
info: [grind.issues] found congruence between
g b
and
f a
but functions have different types
-/
#guard_msgs in
set_option trace.grind.issues true in
set_option trace.grind.debug.proof false in
example (f : Nat → Bool) (g : Int → Bool) (a : Nat) (b : Int) : HEq f g → HEq a b → f a = g b := by
fail_if_success grind
sorry