This PR adds additional tests for `grind`, demonstrating that we can automate some manual proofs from Mathlib's basic category theory library, with less reliance on Mathlib's `@[reassoc]` trick. In several places I've added bidirectional patterns for equational lemmas. I've updated some other files to use the new `@[grind_eq]` attribute (but left as is all cases where we are inspecting the info messages from `grind_pattern`). --------- Co-authored-by: Leonardo de Moura <leomoura@amazon.com>
125 lines
4.8 KiB
Text
125 lines
4.8 KiB
Text
universe v v₁ v₂ v₃ u u₁ u₂ u₃
|
||
|
||
namespace CategoryTheory
|
||
|
||
macro "cat_tac" : tactic => `(tactic| (intros; (try ext); grind))
|
||
|
||
class Category (obj : Type u) : Type max u (v + 1) where
|
||
Hom : obj → obj → Type v
|
||
/-- The identity morphism on an object. -/
|
||
id : ∀ X : obj, Hom X X
|
||
/-- Composition of morphisms in a category, written `f ≫ g`. -/
|
||
comp : ∀ {X Y Z : obj}, (Hom X Y) → (Hom Y Z) → (Hom X Z)
|
||
/-- Identity morphisms are left identities for composition. -/
|
||
id_comp : ∀ {X Y : obj} (f : Hom X Y), comp (id X) f = f := by cat_tac
|
||
/-- Identity morphisms are right identities for composition. -/
|
||
comp_id : ∀ {X Y : obj} (f : Hom X Y), comp f (id Y) = f := by cat_tac
|
||
/-- Composition in a category is associative. -/
|
||
assoc : ∀ {W X Y Z : obj} (f : Hom W X) (g : Hom X Y) (h : Hom Y Z), comp (comp f g) h = comp f (comp g h) := by cat_tac
|
||
|
||
infixr:10 " ⟶ " => Category.Hom
|
||
scoped notation "𝟙" => Category.id -- type as \b1
|
||
scoped infixr:80 " ≫ " => Category.comp
|
||
|
||
attribute [simp] Category.id_comp Category.comp_id Category.assoc
|
||
|
||
attribute [grind =] Category.id_comp Category.comp_id
|
||
attribute [grind _=_] Category.assoc
|
||
|
||
structure Functor (C : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} C] (D : Type u₂) [Category.{v₂} D] : Type max v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂ where
|
||
/-- The action of a functor on objects. -/
|
||
obj : C → D
|
||
/-- The action of a functor on morphisms. -/
|
||
map : ∀ {X Y : C}, (X ⟶ Y) → ((obj X) ⟶ (obj Y))
|
||
/-- A functor preserves identity morphisms. -/
|
||
map_id : ∀ X : C, map (𝟙 X) = 𝟙 (obj X) := by cat_tac
|
||
/-- A functor preserves composition. -/
|
||
map_comp : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z), map (f ≫ g) = (map f) ≫ (map g) := by cat_tac
|
||
|
||
attribute [simp] Functor.map_id Functor.map_comp
|
||
|
||
attribute [grind =] Functor.map_id
|
||
attribute [grind _=_] Functor.map_comp
|
||
|
||
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] {E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E]
|
||
variable {F G H : Functor C D}
|
||
|
||
namespace Functor
|
||
|
||
def comp (F : Functor C D) (G : Functor D E) : Functor C E where
|
||
obj X := G.obj (F.obj X)
|
||
map f := G.map (F.map f)
|
||
-- Note `map_id` and `map_comp` are handled by `cat_tac`.
|
||
|
||
variable {X Y : C} {G : Functor D E}
|
||
|
||
@[simp, grind =] theorem comp_obj : (F.comp G).obj X = G.obj (F.obj X) := rfl
|
||
@[simp, grind =] theorem comp_map (f : X ⟶ Y) : (F.comp G).map f = G.map (F.map f) := rfl
|
||
|
||
end Functor
|
||
|
||
@[ext]
|
||
structure NatTrans [Category.{v₁, u₁} C] [Category.{v₂, u₂} D] (F G : Functor C D) : Type max u₁ v₂ where
|
||
/-- The component of a natural transformation. -/
|
||
app : ∀ X : C, F.obj X ⟶ G.obj X
|
||
/-- The naturality square for a given morphism. -/
|
||
naturality : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y), F.map f ≫ app Y = app X ≫ G.map f := by cat_tac
|
||
|
||
attribute [simp, grind =] NatTrans.naturality
|
||
|
||
namespace NatTrans
|
||
|
||
variable {X : C}
|
||
|
||
protected def id (F : Functor C D) : NatTrans F F where app X := 𝟙 (F.obj X)
|
||
|
||
@[simp, grind =] theorem id_app : (NatTrans.id F).app X = 𝟙 (F.obj X) := rfl
|
||
|
||
protected def vcomp (α : NatTrans F G) (β : NatTrans G H) : NatTrans F H where
|
||
app X := α.app X ≫ β.app X
|
||
-- `naturality` is now handled by `grind`; in Mathlib this relies on `@[reassoc]` attributes.
|
||
-- Manual proof:
|
||
-- rw [← Category.assoc]
|
||
-- rw [α.naturality f]
|
||
-- rw [Category.assoc]
|
||
-- rw [β.naturality f]
|
||
-- rw [← Category.assoc]
|
||
|
||
@[simp, grind =] theorem vcomp_app (α : NatTrans F G) (β : NatTrans G H) (X : C) :
|
||
(α.vcomp β).app X = α.app X ≫ β.app X := rfl
|
||
|
||
end NatTrans
|
||
|
||
instance Functor.category : Category.{max u₁ v₂} (Functor C D) where
|
||
Hom F G := NatTrans F G
|
||
id F := NatTrans.id F
|
||
comp α β := NatTrans.vcomp α β
|
||
-- Here we're okay: all the proofs are handled by `cat_tac`.
|
||
|
||
@[simp, grind =]
|
||
theorem id_app (F : Functor C D) (X : C) : (𝟙 F : F ⟶ F).app X = 𝟙 (F.obj X) := rfl
|
||
|
||
@[simp, grind _=_]
|
||
theorem comp_app {F G H : Functor C D} (α : F ⟶ G) (β : G ⟶ H) (X : C) :
|
||
(α ≫ β).app X = α.app X ≫ β.app X := rfl
|
||
|
||
theorem app_naturality {F G : Functor C (Functor D E)} (T : F ⟶ G) (X : C) {Y Z : D} (f : Y ⟶ Z) :
|
||
(F.obj X).map f ≫ (T.app X).app Z = (T.app X).app Y ≫ (G.obj X).map f := by
|
||
cat_tac
|
||
|
||
theorem naturality_app {F G : Functor C (Functor D E)} (T : F ⟶ G) (Z : D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
|
||
(F.map f).app Z ≫ (T.app Y).app Z = (T.app X).app Z ≫ (G.map f).app Z := by
|
||
cat_tac -- this is done manually in Mathlib!
|
||
-- rw [← comp_app]
|
||
-- rw [T.naturality f]
|
||
-- rw [comp_app]
|
||
|
||
open Category Functor NatTrans
|
||
|
||
def hcomp {H I : Functor D E} (α : F ⟶ G) (β : H ⟶ I) : F.comp H ⟶ G.comp I where
|
||
app := fun X : C => β.app (F.obj X) ≫ I.map (α.app X)
|
||
-- `grind` can now handle `naturality`, while Mathlib does this manually:
|
||
-- rw [Functor.comp_map, Functor.comp_map, ← assoc, naturality, assoc, ← I.map_comp, naturality,
|
||
-- map_comp, assoc]
|
||
|
||
end CategoryTheory
|