lean4-htt/tests/lean/run/6655.lean
Marc Huisinga 9d427fdfcf
feat: "try this" messages with support for interactivity (#10524)
This PR adds support for interactivity to the combined "try this"
messages that were introduced in #9966. In doing so, it moves the link
to apply a suggestion to a separate `[apply]` button in front of the
suggestion. Hints with diffs remain unchanged, as they did not
previously support interacting with terms in the diff, either.

<img width="379" height="256" alt="Suggestion with interactive message"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7838ebf6-0613-46e7-bc88-468a05acbf51"
/>
2025-10-13 13:39:03 +00:00

119 lines
2.4 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

/-!
# Improve zeta-delta tracking for `simp?`
https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/6655 reports issues with `simp?` where
it would over-report local variables. This comes down to two kinds of issues:
- zeta-delta tracking wasn't being reset, so previous `simp?`s would contribute variables
- `simp?` would report variables that weren't explicitly mentioned,
because `whnf` would be run with different configurations during the tracking.
(e.g. `withInferTypeConfig` enables `zetaDelta`.)
This file tests that it resets the tracking and filters the list.
-/
set_option linter.unusedSimpArgs false
/-!
Example from #6655. This used to suggest `simp only [e, d]`.
-/
/--
info: Try this:
[apply] simp only [e]
---
trace: α : Type
c : αα
x : α
d : αα := c
e : αα := d
⊢ d x = x
---
warning: declaration uses 'sorry'
-/
#guard_msgs in
example {α : Type} (c : αα) (x : α) : c x = x := by
let d := c
let e := d
change e x = x
simp? [e]
trace_state
sorry
/-!
Example from #6655. This used to suggest `simp only [d]`.
-/
/--
info: Try this:
[apply] simp only
---
warning: declaration uses 'sorry'
-/
#guard_msgs in
example {α : Type} (c : αα) (x : α) : c x = x := by
let d := c
change d x = x
simp [d]
have : x = x := by
simp?
sorry
/-!
Example from comments of #6655. This used to suggest `simp only [Int.add_sub_cancel, p]`.
(N.B. the goal at that point does not have `p` in it!)
-/
/--
info: Try this:
[apply] simp only [Int.add_sub_cancel]
-/
#guard_msgs in
example (a b : Int) : a + b - b = a := by
let p := 1
have h : p = 1 := by
simp only [p]
simp?
/-!
Example from https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/7539 by JovanGerb.
This used to suggest `simp only [a, b] ` and `simp only [a, b]`
-/
/--
info: Try this:
[apply] simp only [a]
---
info: Try this:
[apply] simp only
-/
#guard_msgs in
example : True := by
let a := 1
let b := 2
have : b = 2 := by simp [a,b]
have : a = 1 := by simp? [a]
have : 1 = 1 := by simp?
trivial
/-!
Test that there is still a deficiency. This should say `simp only [e]`.
-/
/--
info: Try this:
[apply] simp only [e, c]
---
trace: α : Type
b : αα
x : α
c : αα := b
d : αα := c
e : αα := d
⊢ d x = x
---
warning: declaration uses 'sorry'
-/
#guard_msgs in
example {α : Type} (b : αα) (x : α) : b x = x := by
let c := b
let d := c
let e := d
change e x = x
simp? [e, c]
trace_state
sorry