08eb78a5b2
This PR sets up the new integrated test/bench suite. It then migrates all benchmarks and some related tests to the new suite. There's also some documentation and some linting. For now, a lot of the old tests are left alone so this PR doesn't become even larger than it already is. Eventually, all tests should be migrated to the new suite though so there isn't a confusing mix of two systems.
39 lines
969 B
Text
39 lines
969 B
Text
/-!
|
||
# Avoid delaborating with field notation if object is a metavariable application.
|
||
|
||
https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/5993
|
||
-/
|
||
|
||
set_option pp.mvars false
|
||
|
||
/-!
|
||
No field notation notation here. Used to print `refine ?_.succ` and `refine ?_.snd`.
|
||
-/
|
||
|
||
/--
|
||
info: Try this:
|
||
[apply] refine Nat.succ ?_
|
||
---
|
||
info: found a partial proof, but the corresponding tactic failed:
|
||
(expose_names; refine Prod.snd ?_)
|
||
|
||
It may be possible to correct this proof by adding type annotations, explicitly specifying implicit arguments, or eliminating unnecessary function abstractions.
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : Nat := by
|
||
show_term refine Nat.succ ?_
|
||
show_term refine Prod.snd (α := Int) ?_
|
||
exact default
|
||
|
||
/-!
|
||
No field notation even under binders. (That is, be aware of delayed assignment metavariables.)
|
||
-/
|
||
|
||
/--
|
||
info: Try this:
|
||
[apply] refine fun x => Nat.succ ?_
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : Nat → Nat := by
|
||
show_term refine fun _ => Nat.succ ?_
|
||
exact default
|