Leonardo de Moura 272dd5533f chore: style use · instead of . for lambda dot notation ... We are considering removing `.` as an alternative for `·` in the lambda dot notation (e.g., `(·+·)`). Reasons: - `.` is not a perfect replacement for `·` (e.g., `(·.insert ·)`) - `.` is too overloaded: `(f.x)` and `(f .x)` and `(f . x)`. We want to keep the first two.		2022-03-11 07:49:03 -08:00
..
anonymous_constructor_error_msg.lean
bind_with_existential_types.lean
equation_compiler_slow_with_many_constructors.lean
equation_compiler_slow_with_many_constructors2.lean
error_aux_decl_exists.lean
ImplicitLambdas.lean
invalid_field_notation_error_msg.lean
issues1.lean
issues2.lean
issues3.lean
issues4.lean
issues5.lean
issues6.lean
issues7.lean
issues8.lean
leaky_tmp_metavars.lean
leaky_tmp_metavars2.lean
let_destruct_inside_forall.lean
namespace_vs_prefix.lean
nested_namespace_vs_prefix.lean
overload_with_list_coercion.lean
patternIssue.lean
private.lean
ProjNotation.lean
Reid1.lean
structInst.lean
structure_same_names2.lean
typeclass_nested_validate.lean
typeclass_triggers_typeclass.lean
typeclasses_with_emetavariables.lean
typeclasses_with_preconditions.lean	chore: style use · instead of . for lambda dot notation	2022-03-11 07:49:03 -08:00
typeclasses_with_umetavariables.lean
variable_universe_bug.lean
vars.lean
zmod.lean