lean4-htt/tests/lean/run/grind_reducible.lean
Leonardo de Moura 3f0acbbb48
fix: use isClass? instead of binder annotation to identify instance parameters (#12172)
This PR fixes how we determine whether a function parameter is an
instance.
Previously, we relied on binder annotations (e.g., `[Ring A]` vs `{_ :
Ring A}`)
to make this determination. This is unreliable because users
legitimately use
`{..}` binders for class types when the instance is already available
from
context. For example:
```lean
structure OrdSet (α : Type) [Hashable α] [BEq α] where
  ...

def OrdSet.insert {_ : Hashable α} {_ : BEq α} (s : OrdSet α) (a : α) : OrdSet α :=
  ...
```

Here, `Hashable` and `BEq` are classes, but the `{..}` binder is
intentional, the
instances come from `OrdSet`'s parameters, so type class resolution is
unnecessary.

The fix checks the parameter's *type* using `isClass?` rather than its
syntax, and
caches this information in `FunInfo`. This affects several subsystems:

- **Discrimination trees**: instance parameters should not be indexed
even if marked with `{..}`
- **Congruence lemma generation**: instances require special treatment
- **`grind` canonicalizer**: must ensure canonical instances

**Potential regressions**: automation may now behave differently in
cases where it
previously misidentified instance parameters. For example, a rewrite
rule in `simp` that was
not firing due to incorrect indexing may now fire.

---------

Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <kim@tqft.net>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-01-28 20:33:43 +00:00

62 lines
2.1 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

variable {α β γ : Type}
structure Equiv (α β : Type) where
toFun : α → β
invFun : β → α
infixl:25 " ≃ " => Equiv
namespace Equiv
instance : CoeFun (α ≃ β) (fun _ => α → β) := ⟨toFun⟩
@[ext, grind ext] theorem ext {f g : Equiv α β} (H : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g := sorry
theorem congr_fun {f g : Equiv α β} (h : f = g) (x : α) : f x = g x := by rw [h]
def symm (e : α ≃ β) : β ≃ α := ⟨e.invFun, e.toFun⟩
def trans (e₁ : α ≃ β) (e₂ : β ≃ γ) : αγ := ⟨e₂ ∘ e₁, e₁.symm ∘ e₂.symm⟩
def sigmaCongrRight {α : Type} {β₁ β₂ : α → Type} (F : ∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a) : (Σ a, β₁ a) ≃ Σ a, β₂ a where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, F a.1 a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, (F a.1).symm a.2⟩
def sigmaEquivProd (α β : Type) : (Σ _ : α, β) ≃ α × β where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
end Equiv
variable {α₁ β₁ β₂ : Type} (e : α₁ → β₁ ≃ β₂)
def prodCongrRight : α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₁ × β₂ where
toFun ab := ⟨ab.1, e ab.1 ab.2⟩
invFun ab := ⟨ab.1, (e ab.1).symm ab.2⟩
example :
(Equiv.sigmaCongrRight e).trans (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₂)
= (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₁).trans (prodCongrRight e) := by
grind -reducible only [Equiv.congr_fun]
example :
(Equiv.sigmaCongrRight e).trans (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₂)
= (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₁).trans (prodCongrRight e) := by
grind -reducible only => finish only [Equiv.congr_fun]
example :
(Equiv.sigmaCongrRight e).trans (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₂)
= (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₁).trans (prodCongrRight e) := by
grind -reducible => cases #d592 <;> instantiate only [Equiv.congr_fun]
/--
info: Try these:
[apply] grind -reducible only [Equiv.congr_fun, #d592]
[apply] grind -reducible only [Equiv.congr_fun]
[apply] grind -reducible => cases #d592 <;> instantiate only [Equiv.congr_fun]
-/
#guard_msgs in
example :
(Equiv.sigmaCongrRight e).trans (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₂)
= (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₁).trans (prodCongrRight e) := by
grind? -reducible [Equiv.congr_fun]