faee08591f
This is a big change because we have to store in constraints whether we can use the "relaxed" rules or not. The "relaxed" case says that when type checking the value of an opaque definition we can treat other opaque definitions in the same module as transparent. Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
22 lines
1 KiB
C++
22 lines
1 KiB
C++
/*
|
|
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
|
|
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
|
|
|
|
Author: Leonardo de Moura
|
|
*/
|
|
#pragma once
|
|
#include <utility>
|
|
#include "util/list.h"
|
|
#include "kernel/environment.h"
|
|
#include "kernel/metavar.h"
|
|
#include "library/io_state.h"
|
|
#include "frontends/lean/local_decls.h"
|
|
|
|
namespace lean {
|
|
std::tuple<expr, level_param_names> elaborate(environment const & env, local_decls<level> const & lls, list<expr> const & ctx,
|
|
io_state const & ios, expr const & e, bool relax_main_opaque,
|
|
pos_info_provider * pp = nullptr, bool check_unassigned = true, bool ensure_type = false);
|
|
std::tuple<expr, expr, level_param_names> elaborate(environment const & env, local_decls<level> const & lls,
|
|
io_state const & ios, name const & n, expr const & t, expr const & v,
|
|
bool is_opaque, pos_info_provider * pp = nullptr);
|
|
}
|