lean4-htt/src/Init/Control/Basic.lean
2025-04-23 17:21:33 +00:00

434 lines
17 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura, Sebastian Ullrich
-/
module
prelude
import Init.Core
import Init.BinderNameHint
universe u v w
/--
A `ForIn'` instance, which handles `for h : x in c do`,
can also handle `for x in x do` by ignoring `h`, and so provides a `ForIn` instance.
Note that this instance will cause a potentially non-defeq duplication if both `ForIn` and `ForIn'`
instances are provided for the same type.
-/
-- We set the priority to 500 so it is below the default,
-- but still above the low priority instance from `Stream`.
instance (priority := 500) instForInOfForIn' [ForIn' m ρ α d] : ForIn m ρ α where
forIn x b f := forIn' x b fun a _ => f a
@[simp] theorem forIn'_eq_forIn [d : Membership α ρ] [ForIn' m ρ α d] {β} [Monad m] (x : ρ) (b : β)
(f : (a : α) → a ∈ x → β → m (ForInStep β)) (g : (a : α) → β → m (ForInStep β))
(h : ∀ a m b, f a m b = g a b) :
forIn' x b f = forIn x b g := by
simp [instForInOfForIn']
congr
apply funext
intro a
apply funext
intro m
apply funext
intro b
simp [h]
rfl
@[wf_preprocess] theorem forIn_eq_forIn' [d : Membership α ρ] [ForIn' m ρ α d] {β} [Monad m]
(x : ρ) (b : β) (f : (a : α) → β → m (ForInStep β)) :
forIn x b f = forIn' x b (fun x h => binderNameHint x f <| binderNameHint h () <| f x) := by
rfl
@[deprecated forIn_eq_forIn' (since := "2025-04-04")]
abbrev forIn_eq_forin' := @forIn_eq_forIn'
/--
Extracts the value from a `ForInStep`, ignoring whether it is `ForInStep.done` or `ForInStep.yield`.
-/
def ForInStep.value (x : ForInStep α) : α :=
match x with
| ForInStep.done b => b
| ForInStep.yield b => b
@[simp] theorem ForInStep.value_done (b : β) : (ForInStep.done b).value = b := rfl
@[simp] theorem ForInStep.value_yield (b : β) : (ForInStep.yield b).value = b := rfl
/--
Maps a function over a functor, with parameters swapped so that the function comes last.
This function is `Functor.map` with the parameters reversed, typically used via the `<&>` operator.
-/
@[reducible]
def Functor.mapRev {f : Type u → Type v} [Functor f] {α β : Type u} : f α → (α → β) → f β :=
fun a f => f <$> a
@[inherit_doc Functor.mapRev]
infixr:100 " <&> " => Functor.mapRev
recommended_spelling "mapRev" for "<&>" in [Functor.mapRev, «term_<&>_»]
/--
Discards the value in a functor, retaining the functor's structure.
Discarding values is especially useful when using `Applicative` functors or `Monad`s to implement
effects, and some operation should be carried out only for its effects. In `do`-notation, statements
whose values are discarded must return `Unit`, and `discard` can be used to explicitly discard their
values.
-/
@[always_inline, inline]
def Functor.discard {f : Type u → Type v} {α : Type u} [Functor f] (x : f α) : f PUnit :=
Functor.mapConst PUnit.unit x
export Functor (discard)
/--
An `Alternative` functor is an `Applicative` functor that can "fail" or be "empty"
and a binary operation `<|>` that “collects values” or finds the “left-most success”.
Important instances include
* `Option`, where `failure := none` and `<|>` returns the left-most `some`.
* Parser combinators typically provide an `Applicative` instance for error-handling and
backtracking.
Error recovery and state can interact subtly. For example, the implementation of `Alternative` for `OptionT (StateT σ Id)` keeps modifications made to the state while recovering from failure, while `StateT σ (OptionT Id)` discards them.
-/
-- NB: List instance is in mathlib. Once upstreamed, add
-- * `List`, where `failure` is the empty list and `<|>` concatenates.
class Alternative (f : Type u → Type v) : Type (max (u+1) v) extends Applicative f where
/--
Produces an empty collection or recoverable failure. The `<|>` operator collects values or recovers
from failures. See `Alternative` for more details.
-/
failure : {α : Type u} → f α
/--
Depending on the `Alternative` instance, collects values or recovers from `failure`s by
returning the leftmost success. Can be written using the `<|>` operator syntax.
-/
orElse : {α : Type u} → f α → (Unit → f α) → f α
instance (f : Type u → Type v) (α : Type u) [Alternative f] : OrElse (f α) := ⟨Alternative.orElse⟩
variable {f : Type u → Type v} [Alternative f] {α : Type u}
export Alternative (failure)
/--
If the proposition `p` is true, does nothing, else fails (using `failure`).
-/
@[always_inline, inline] def guard {f : Type → Type v} [Alternative f] (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : f Unit :=
if p then pure () else failure
/--
Returns `some x` if `f` succeeds with value `x`, else returns `none`.
-/
@[always_inline, inline] def optional (x : f α) : f (Option α) :=
some <$> x <|> pure none
class ToBool (α : Type u) where
toBool : α → Bool
export ToBool (toBool)
instance : ToBool Bool where
toBool b := b
@[macro_inline] def bool {β : Type u} {α : Type v} [ToBool β] (f t : α) (b : β) : α :=
match toBool b with
| true => t
| false => f
/--
Converts the result of the monadic action `x` to a `Bool`. If it is `true`, returns it and ignores
`y`; otherwise, runs `y` and returns its result.
This a monadic counterpart to the short-circuiting `||` operator, usually accessed via the `<||>`
operator.
-/
@[macro_inline] def orM {m : Type u → Type v} {β : Type u} [Monad m] [ToBool β] (x y : m β) : m β := do
let b ← x
match toBool b with
| true => pure b
| false => y
infixr:30 " <||> " => orM
recommended_spelling "orM" for "<||>" in [orM, «term_<||>_»]
/--
Converts the result of the monadic action `x` to a `Bool`. If it is `true`, returns `y`; otherwise,
returns the original result of `x`.
This a monadic counterpart to the short-circuiting `&&` operator, usually accessed via the `<&&>`
operator.
-/
@[macro_inline] def andM {m : Type u → Type v} {β : Type u} [Monad m] [ToBool β] (x y : m β) : m β := do
let b ← x
match toBool b with
| true => y
| false => pure b
infixr:35 " <&&> " => andM
recommended_spelling "andM" for "<&&>" in [andM, «term_<&&>_»]
/--
Runs a monadic action and returns the negation of its result.
-/
@[macro_inline] def notM {m : Type → Type v} [Functor m] (x : m Bool) : m Bool :=
not <$> x
/-!
# How `MonadControl` works
There is a [tutorial by Alexis King](https://lexi-lambda.github.io/blog/2019/09/07/demystifying-monadbasecontrol/) that this docstring is based on.
Suppose we have `foo : ∀ α, IO α → IO α` and `bar : StateT σ IO β` (ie, `bar : σ → IO (σ × β)`).
We might want to 'map' `bar` by `foo`. Concretely we would write this as:
```lean
opaque foo : ∀ {α}, IO α → IO α
opaque bar : StateT σ IO β
def mapped_foo : StateT σ IO β := do
let s ← get
let (b, s') ← liftM <| foo <| StateT.run bar s
set s'
return b
```
This is fine but it's not going to generalise, what if we replace `StateT Nat IO` with a large tower of monad transformers?
We would have to rewrite the above to handle each of the `run` functions for each transformer in the stack.
Is there a way to generalise `run` as a kind of inverse of `lift`?
We have `lift : m α → StateT σ m α` for all `m`, but we also need to 'unlift' the state.
But `unlift : StateT σ IO α → IO α` can't be implemented. So we need something else.
If we look at the definition of `mapped_foo`, we see that `lift <| foo <| StateT.run bar s`
has the type `IO (σ × β)`. The key idea is that `σ × β` contains all of the information needed to reconstruct the state and the new value.
Now lets define some values to generalise `mapped_foo`:
- Write `IO (σ × β)` as `IO (stM β)`
- Write `StateT.run . s` as `mapInBase : StateT σ IO α → IO (stM β)`
- Define `restoreM : IO (stM α) → StateT σ IO α` as below
```lean
def stM (α : Type) := α × σ
def restoreM (x : IO (stM α)) : StateT σ IO α := do
let (a,s) ← liftM x
set s
return a
```
To get:
```lean
def mapped_foo' : StateT σ IO β := do
let s ← get
let mapInBase := fun z => StateT.run z s
restoreM <| foo <| mapInBase bar
```
and finally define
```lean
def control {α : Type}
(f : ({β : Type} → StateT σ IO β → IO (stM β)) → IO (stM α))
: StateT σ IO α := do
let s ← get
let mapInBase := fun {β} (z : StateT σ IO β) => StateT.run z s
let r : IO (stM α) := f mapInBase
restoreM r
```
Now we can write `mapped_foo` as:
```lean
def mapped_foo'' : StateT σ IO β :=
control (fun mapInBase => foo (mapInBase bar))
```
The core idea of `mapInBase` is that given any `β`, it runs an instance of
`StateT σ IO β` and 'packages' the result and state as `IO (stM β)` so that it can be piped through `foo`.
Once it's been through `foo` we can then unpack the state again with `restoreM`.
Hence we can apply `foo` to `bar` without losing track of the state.
Here `stM β = σ × β` is the 'packaged result state', but we can generalise:
if we have a tower `StateT σ₁ <| StateT σ₂ <| IO`, then the
composite packaged state is going to be `stM₁₂ β := σ₁ × σ₂ × β` or `stM₁₂ := stM₁ ∘ stM₂`.
`MonadControl m n` means that when programming in the monad `n`,
we can switch to a base monad `m` using `control`, just like with `liftM`.
In contrast to `liftM`, however, we also get a function `runInBase` that
allows us to "lower" actions in `n` into `m`.
This is really useful when we have large towers of monad transformers, as we do in the metaprogramming library.
For example there is a function `withNewMCtxDepthImp : MetaM α → MetaM α` that runs the input monad instance
in a new nested metavariable context. We can lift this to `withNewMctxDepth : n α → n α` using `MonadControlT MetaM n`
(`MonadControlT` is the transitive closure of `MonadControl`).
Which means that we can also run `withNewMctxDepth` in the `Tactic` monad without needing to
faff around with lifts and all the other boilerplate needed in `mapped_foo`.
## Relationship to `MonadFunctor`
A stricter form of `MonadControl` is `MonadFunctor`, which defines
`monadMap {α} : (∀ {β}, m β → m β) → n α → n α`. Using `monadMap` it is also possible to define `mapped_foo` above.
However there are some mappings which can't be derived using `MonadFunctor`. For example:
```lean,ignore
@[inline] def map1MetaM [MonadControlT MetaM n] [Monad n] (f : forall {α}, (β → MetaM α) → MetaM α) {α} (k : β → n α) : n α :=
control fun runInBase => f fun b => runInBase <| k b
@[inline] def map2MetaM [MonadControlT MetaM n] [Monad n] (f : forall {α}, (β → γ → MetaM α) → MetaM α) {α} (k : β → γ → n α) : n α :=
control fun runInBase => f fun b c => runInBase <| k b c
```
In `monadMap`, we can only 'run in base' a single computation in `n` into the base monad `m`.
Using `control` means that `runInBase` can be used multiple times.
-/
/--
A way to lift a computation from one monad to another while providing the lifted computation with a
means of interpreting computations from the outer monad. This provides a means of lifting
higher-order operations automatically.
Clients should typically use `control` or `controlAt`, which request an instance of `MonadControlT`:
the reflexive, transitive closure of `MonadControl`. New instances should be defined for
`MonadControl` itself.
-/
-- This is the same as
-- [`MonadBaseControl`](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/monad-control-1.0.3.1/docs/Control-Monad-Trans-Control.html#t:MonadBaseControl)
-- in Haskell.
class MonadControl (m : semiOutParam (Type u → Type v)) (n : Type u → Type w) where
/--
A type that can be used to reconstruct both a returned value and any state used by the outer
monad.
-/
stM : Type u → Type u
/--
Lifts an action from the inner monad `m` to the outer monad `n`. The inner monad has access to a
reverse lifting operator that can run an `n` action, returning a value and state together.
-/
liftWith : {α : Type u} → (({β : Type u} → n β → m (stM β)) → m α) → n α
/--
Lifts a monadic action that returns a state and a value in the inner monad to an action in the
outer monad. The extra state information is used to restore the results of effects from the
reverse lift passed to `liftWith`'s parameter.
-/
restoreM : {α : Type u} → m (stM α) → n α
/--
A way to lift a computation from one monad to another while providing the lifted computation with a
means of interpreting computations from the outer monad. This provides a means of lifting
higher-order operations automatically.
Clients should typically use `control` or `controlAt`, which request an instance of `MonadControlT`:
the reflexive, transitive closure of `MonadControl`. New instances should be defined for
`MonadControl` itself.
-/
class MonadControlT (m : Type u → Type v) (n : Type u → Type w) where
/--
A type that can be used to reconstruct both a returned value and any state used by the outer
monad.
-/
stM : Type u → Type u
/--
Lifts an action from the inner monad `m` to the outer monad `n`. The inner monad has access to a
reverse lifting operator that can run an `n` action, returning a value and state together.
-/
liftWith : {α : Type u} → (({β : Type u} → n β → m (stM β)) → m α) → n α
/--
Lifts a monadic action that returns a state and a value in the inner monad to an action in the
outer monad. The extra state information is used to restore the results of effects from the
reverse lift passed to `liftWith`'s parameter.
-/
restoreM {α : Type u} : stM α → n α
export MonadControlT (stM liftWith restoreM)
@[always_inline]
instance (m n o) [MonadControl n o] [MonadControlT m n] : MonadControlT m o where
stM α := stM m n (MonadControl.stM n o α)
liftWith f := MonadControl.liftWith fun x₂ => liftWith fun x₁ => f (x₁ ∘ x₂)
restoreM := MonadControl.restoreM ∘ restoreM
instance (m : Type u → Type v) [Pure m] : MonadControlT m m where
stM α := α
liftWith f := f fun x => x
restoreM x := pure x
/--
Lifts an operation from an inner monad to an outer monad, providing it with a reverse lifting
operator that allows outer monad computations to be run in the inner monad. The lifted operation is
required to return extra information that is required in order to reconstruct the reverse lift's
effects in the outer monad; this extra information is determined by `stM`.
This function takes the inner monad as an explicit parameter. Use `control` to infer the monad.
-/
@[always_inline, inline]
def controlAt (m : Type u → Type v) {n : Type u → Type w} [MonadControlT m n] [Bind n] {α : Type u}
(f : ({β : Type u} → n β → m (stM m n β)) → m (stM m n α)) : n α :=
liftWith f >>= restoreM
/--
Lifts an operation from an inner monad to an outer monad, providing it with a reverse lifting
operator that allows outer monad computations to be run in the inner monad. The lifted operation is
required to return extra information that is required in order to reconstruct the reverse lift's
effects in the outer monad; this extra information is determined by `stM`.
This function takes the inner monad as an implicit parameter. Use `controlAt` to specify it
explicitly.
-/
@[always_inline, inline]
def control {m : Type u → Type v} {n : Type u → Type w} [MonadControlT m n] [Bind n] {α : Type u}
(f : ({β : Type u} → n β → m (stM m n β)) → m (stM m n α)) : n α :=
controlAt m f
/--
Overloaded monadic iteration over some container type.
An instance of `ForM m γ α` describes how to iterate a monadic operator over a container of type `γ`
with elements of type `α` in the monad `m`. The element type should be uniquely determined by the
monad and the container.
Use `ForM.forIn` to construct a `ForIn` instance from a `ForM` instance, thus enabling the use of
the `for` operator in `do`-notation.
-/
class ForM (m : Type u → Type v) (γ : Type w₁) (α : outParam (Type w₂)) where
/--
Runs the monadic action `f` on each element of the collection `coll`.
-/
forM [Monad m] (coll : γ) (f : α → m PUnit) : m PUnit
export ForM (forM)
/-- Left-to-right composition of Kleisli arrows. -/
@[always_inline]
def Bind.kleisliRight [Bind m] (f₁ : α → m β) (f₂ : β → m γ) (a : α) : m γ :=
f₁ a >>= f₂
/-- Right-to-left composition of Kleisli arrows. -/
@[always_inline]
def Bind.kleisliLeft [Bind m] (f₂ : β → m γ) (f₁ : α → m β) (a : α) : m γ :=
f₁ a >>= f₂
/-- Same as `Bind.bind` but with arguments swapped. -/
@[always_inline]
def Bind.bindLeft [Bind m] (f : α → m β) (ma : m α) : m β :=
ma >>= f
-- Precedence choice taken to be the same as in haskell:
-- https://hackage.haskell.org/package/base-4.17.0.0/docs/Control-Monad.html#v:-61--60--60-
@[inherit_doc] infixr:55 " >=> " => Bind.kleisliRight
@[inherit_doc] infixr:55 " <=< " => Bind.kleisliLeft
@[inherit_doc] infixr:55 " =<< " => Bind.bindLeft
recommended_spelling "kleisliRight" for ">=>" in [Bind.kleisliRight, «term_>=>_»]
recommended_spelling "kleisliLeft" for "<=<" in [Bind.kleisliLeft, «term_<=<_»]
recommended_spelling "bindLeft" for "=<<" in [Bind.bindLeft, «term_=<<_»]