This PR implements RFC #12216: native computation (`native_decide`, `bv_decide`) is represented in the logic as one axiom per computation, asserting the equality that was obtained from the native computation. `#print axiom` will no longer show `Lean.trustCompiler`, but rather the auto-generated names of these axioms (with, for example, `._native.bv_decide.` in the name). See the RFC for more information. This PR introduces a common MetaM helper (`nativeEqTrue`) used by `native_decide` and `bv_decide` alike that runs the computation and then asserts the result using an axiom. It also deprecated the `ofReduceBool` axioms etc. Not included in this PR is infrastructure for enumerating these axioms, prettier `#print axioms` (should we want his) and tactic concurrency. Fixes #12216.
40 lines
1.1 KiB
Text
40 lines
1.1 KiB
Text
set_option linter.unusedVariables false
|
|
|
|
/-
|
|
This example demonstratea that when we are using `native_decide`,
|
|
we are also trusting the correctness of `implemented_by` annotations,
|
|
foreign functions (i.e., `[extern]` annotations), etc.
|
|
-/
|
|
def g (b : Bool) := false
|
|
|
|
/-
|
|
The following `implemented_by` is telling the compiler
|
|
"trust me, `g` does implement `f`"
|
|
which is clearly false in this example.
|
|
-/
|
|
@[implemented_by g]
|
|
def f (b : Bool) := b
|
|
|
|
theorem fConst (b : Bool) : f b = false :=
|
|
match b with
|
|
| true =>
|
|
/- The following `native_decide` is going to use `g` to evaluate `f`
|
|
because of the `implemented_by` directive. -/
|
|
have : (f true) = false := by native_decide
|
|
this
|
|
| false => rfl
|
|
|
|
theorem trueEqFalse : true = false :=
|
|
have h₁ : f true = true := rfl;
|
|
have h₂ : f true = false := fConst true;
|
|
Eq.trans h₁.symm h₂
|
|
|
|
/-
|
|
We managed to prove `False` using the unsound annotation `implemented_by` above.
|
|
-/
|
|
theorem unsound : False :=
|
|
Bool.noConfusion trueEqFalse
|
|
|
|
/-- info: 'unsound' depends on axioms: [fConst._native.native_decide.ax_1_3] -/
|
|
#guard_msgs in
|
|
#print axioms unsound
|