lean4-htt/tests/lean/run/grind_pre.lean
Leonardo de Moura 14841ad1ed
fix: bugs in grind (#6748)
This PR fixes a few bugs in the `grind` tactic: missing issues, bad
error messages, incorrect threshold in the canonicalizer, and bug in the
ground pattern internalizer.
2025-01-22 21:59:58 +00:00

231 lines
4.8 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

abbrev f (a : α) := a
set_option grind.debug true
set_option grind.debug.proofs true
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind.1.2
a b c : Bool
p q : Prop
left✝ : a = true
left : p
right : q
h✝ : b = false
h : c = true
⊢ False
[grind] Diagnostics
[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] a = true
[prop] b = true c = true
[prop] p
[prop] q
[prop] b = false a = false
[prop] b = false
[prop] c = true
[eqc] True propositions
[prop] b = true c = true
[prop] p
[prop] q
[prop] b = false a = false
[prop] b = false
[prop] c = true
[eqc] Equivalence classes
[eqc] {b = true, a = false}
[eqc] {b, false}
[eqc] {a, c, true}
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
theorem ex (h : (f a && (b || f (f c))) = true) (h' : p ∧ q) : b && a := by
grind
section
attribute [local grind cases eager] Or
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind.2.1
a b c : Bool
p q : Prop
left✝ : a = true
h✝ : c = true
left : p
right : q
h : b = false
⊢ False
[grind] Diagnostics
[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] a = true
[prop] c = true
[prop] p
[prop] q
[prop] b = false
[eqc] True propositions
[prop] p
[prop] q
[eqc] Equivalence classes
[eqc] {b, false}
[eqc] {a, c, true}
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
theorem ex2 (h : (f a && (b || f (f c))) = true) (h' : p ∧ q) : b && a := by
grind
end
def g (i : Nat) (j : Nat) (_ : i > j := by omega) := i + j
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind
i j : Nat
h : j + 1 < i + 1
h✝ : j + 1 ≤ i
x✝ : ¬g (i + 1) j ⋯ = i + j + 1
⊢ False
[grind] Diagnostics
[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] j + 1 ≤ i
[prop] ¬g (i + 1) j ⋯ = i + j + 1
[eqc] True propositions
[prop] j + 1 ≤ i
[eqc] False propositions
[prop] g (i + 1) j ⋯ = i + j + 1
[offset] Assignment satisfying offset contraints
[assign] j := 0
[assign] i := 1
[assign] i + j := 1
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
example (i j : Nat) (h : i + 1 > j + 1) : g (i+1) j = f ((fun x => x) i) + f j + 1 := by
grind
structure Point where
x : Nat
y : Int
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind
a₁ : Point
a₂ : Nat
a₃ : Int
as : List Point
b₁ : Point
bs : List Point
b₂ : Nat
b₃ : Int
head_eq : a₁ = b₁
x_eq : a₂ = b₂
y_eq : a₃ = b₃
tail_eq : as = bs
⊢ False
[grind] Diagnostics
[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] a₁ = b₁
[prop] a₂ = b₂
[prop] a₃ = b₃
[prop] as = bs
[eqc] Equivalence classes
[eqc] {as, bs}
[eqc] {a₃, b₃}
[eqc] {a₂, b₂}
[eqc] {a₁, b₁}
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
theorem ex3 (h : a₁ :: { x := a₂, y := a₃ : Point } :: as = b₁ :: { x := b₂, y := b₃} :: bs) : False := by
grind
def h (a : α) := a
example (p : Prop) (a b c : Nat) : p → a = 0 → a = b → h a = h c → a = c ∧ c = a → a = b ∧ b = a → a = c := by
grind
set_option trace.grind.debug.proof true
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind.1
α : Type
a : α
p q r : Prop
h₁ : HEq p a
h₂ : HEq q a
h₃ : p = r
left : ¬p r
h : ¬r
⊢ False
[grind] Diagnostics
[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] HEq p a
[prop] HEq q a
[prop] p = r
[prop] ¬p r
[prop] ¬r p
[prop] ¬r
[eqc] True propositions
[prop] p = r
[prop] ¬p r
[prop] ¬r p
[prop] ¬p
[prop] ¬r
[eqc] False propositions
[prop] a
[prop] p
[prop] q
[prop] r
[grind] Issues
[issue] #1 other goal(s) were not fully processed due to previous failures, threshold: `(failures := 1)`
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
example (a : α) (p q r : Prop) : (h₁ : HEq p a) → (h₂ : HEq q a) → (h₃ : p = r) → False := by
grind
example (a b : Nat) (f : Nat → Nat) : (h₁ : a = b) → (h₂ : f a ≠ f b) → False := by
grind
example (a : α) (p q r : Prop) : (h₁ : HEq p a) → (h₂ : HEq q a) → (h₃ : p = r) → q = r := by
grind
/--
warning: declaration uses 'sorry'
---
info: [grind.issues] found congruence between
g b
and
f a
but functions have different types
-/
#guard_msgs in
set_option trace.grind.issues true in
set_option trace.grind.debug.proof false in
example (f : Nat → Bool) (g : Int → Bool) (a : Nat) (b : Int) : HEq f g → HEq a b → f a = g b := by
fail_if_success grind
sorry
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind
f : Nat → Bool
g : Int → Bool
a : Nat
b : Int
a✝¹ : HEq f g
a✝ : HEq a b
x✝ : ¬f a = g b
⊢ False
[grind] Diagnostics
[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] HEq f g
[prop] HEq a b
[prop] ¬f a = g b
[eqc] False propositions
[prop] f a = g b
[eqc] Equivalence classes
[eqc] {a, b}
[eqc] {f, g}
[grind] Issues
[issue] found congruence between g b and f a but functions have different types
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
example (f : Nat → Bool) (g : Int → Bool) (a : Nat) (b : Int) : HEq f g → HEq a b → f a = g b := by
grind