This PR allows for a leightweight version of dependent `match` in the
new `do` elaborator: discriminant types get abstracted over previous
discriminants. The match result type and the local context still are not
considered for abstraction. For example, if both `i : Nat` and `h : i <
len` are discrminants, then if an alternative matches `i` with `0`, we
also have `h : 0 < len`:
```lean
example {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m] (as : Array α) (b : β) (f : (a : α) → a ∈ as → β → m (ForInStep β)) : m β :=
let rec loop (i : Nat) (h : i ≤ as.size) (b : β) : m β := do
match i, h with
| 0, _ => pure b
| i+1, h =>
have h' : i < as.size := Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_succ_self i) h
have : as.size - 1 < as.size := Nat.sub_lt (Nat.zero_lt_of_lt h') (by decide)
have : as.size - 1 - i < as.size := Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.sub_le (as.size - 1) i) this
match (← f as[as.size - 1 - i] (Array.getElem_mem this) b) with
| ForInStep.done b => pure b
| ForInStep.yield b => loop i (Nat.le_of_lt h') b
loop as.size (Nat.le_refl _) b
```
This feature turns out to be enough to save quite a few adaptations
(6/16) during bootstrep.
7517f768f9