d5e7dbad80
It is confusing that the message suggesting to use the `diagnostics` option is given even when the option is already set. This PR makes use of lazy message data to make the message contingent on the option being false. It also tones down the promise that there is any diagonostic information available, since sometimes there is nothing to report. Suggested by Johan Commelin.
26 lines
801 B
Text
26 lines
801 B
Text
macroStack.lean:4:5-4:6: error: unknown identifier 'x'
|
|
macroStack.lean:8:6-8:7: error: unknown identifier 'x'
|
|
with resulting expansion
|
|
binrel% GT.gt✝ x 0
|
|
while expanding
|
|
x > 0
|
|
while expanding
|
|
(x > 0)
|
|
while expanding
|
|
if h : (x > 0) then 1 else 0
|
|
macroStack.lean:11:9-11:15: error: invalid use of `(<- ...)`, must be nested inside a 'do' expression
|
|
macroStack.lean:17:0-17:6: error: failed to synthesize
|
|
HAdd Nat String ?m
|
|
Additional diagnostic information may be available by using the `set_option diagnostics true` command.
|
|
with resulting expansion
|
|
binop% HAdd.hAdd✝ (x + x✝) x✝¹
|
|
while expanding
|
|
(x + x✝) + x✝¹
|
|
while expanding
|
|
foo!(x + x✝)
|
|
while expanding
|
|
foo!(x + x✝) < 1
|
|
while expanding
|
|
if foo!(x + x✝) < 1 then true✝ else false✝
|
|
while expanding
|
|
bla! x
|