lean4-htt/tests/lean/run/grind_pre.lean
Joachim Breitner b5555052bd
feat: T.ctor.elim single-constructor cases function (#9952)
This PR adds “non-branching case statements”: For each inductive
constructor `T.con` this adds a function `T.con.with` that is similar
`T.casesOn`, but has only one arm (the one for `con`), and an additional
`t.toCtorIdx = 12` assumption.

For example:
```lean
inductive Vec (α : Type) : Nat → Type where
  | nil : Vec α 0
  | cons {n} : α → Vec α n → Vec α (n + 1)

/--
info: @[reducible] protected def Vec.cons.elim.{u} : {α : Type} →
  {motive : (a : Nat) → Vec α a → Sort u} →
    {a : Nat} →
      (t : Vec α a) →
        t.ctorIdx = 1 → ({n : Nat} → (a : α) → (a_1 : Vec α n) → motive (n + 1) (Vec.cons a a_1)) → motive a t
-/
#guard_msgs in
#print sig Vec.cons.elim
```

This is a building block for non-quadratic implementations of `BEq` and
`DecidableEq` etc.

Builds on top of #9951.

The compiled code for a these functions could presumably, without
branching on the inductive value, directly access the fields. Achieving
this optimization (and achieving it without a quadratic compilation
cost) is not in scope for this PR.
2025-08-27 09:40:31 +00:00

217 lines
4.5 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

module
abbrev f (a : α) := a
set_option grind.debug true
set_option grind.debug.proofs true
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind
a b c : Bool
p q : Prop
left : a = true
right : b = true c = true
left_1 : p
right_1 : q
h_1 : (b && a) = false
⊢ False
[grind] Goal diagnostics
[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] a = true
[prop] b = true c = true
[prop] p
[prop] q
[prop] (b && a) = false
[eqc] True propositions
[prop] p
[prop] q
[prop] b = true c = true
[prop] c = true
[eqc] False propositions
[prop] b = true
[eqc] Equivalence classes
[eqc] {a, c, true}
[eqc] {b, false, b && a}
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
theorem ex (h : (f a && (b || f (f c))) = true) (h' : p ∧ q) : b && a := by
grind
section
attribute [local grind cases eager] Or
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind.2
a b c : Bool
p q : Prop
left : a = true
h_1 : c = true
left_1 : p
right_1 : q
h_2 : (b && a) = false
⊢ False
[grind] Goal diagnostics
[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] a = true
[prop] c = true
[prop] p
[prop] q
[prop] (b && a) = false
[eqc] True propositions
[prop] p
[prop] q
[eqc] Equivalence classes
[eqc] {a, c, true}
[eqc] {b, false, b && a}
[grind] Diagnostics
[cases] Cases instances
[cases] Or ↦ 1
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
theorem ex2 (h : (f a && (b || f (f c))) = true) (h' : p ∧ q) : b && a := by
grind
end
def g (i : Nat) (j : Nat) (_ : i > j := by omega) := i + j
/--
trace: [grind.offset.model] i := 1
[grind.offset.model] j := 0
[grind.offset.model] 「0」 := 0
[grind.offset.model] 「i + j」 := 0
[grind.offset.model] 「i + 1」 := 2
[grind.offset.model] 「i + j + 1」 := 1
-/
#guard_msgs (trace) in
set_option trace.grind.offset.model true in
example (i j : Nat) (h : i + 1 > j + 1) : g (i+1) j = f ((fun x => x) i) + f j + 1 := by
fail_if_success grind
sorry
structure Point where
x : Nat
y : Int
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind
a₁ : Point
a₂ : Nat
a₃ : Int
as : List Point
b₁ : Point
bs : List Point
b₂ : Nat
b₃ : Int
head_eq : a₁ = b₁
x_eq : a₂ = b₂
y_eq : a₃ = b₃
tail_eq_1 : as = bs
⊢ False
[grind] Goal diagnostics
[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] a₁ = b₁
[prop] a₂ = b₂
[prop] a₃ = b₃
[prop] as = bs
[eqc] Equivalence classes
[eqc] {a₁, b₁}
[eqc] {a₂, b₂}
[eqc] {a₃, b₃}
[eqc] {as, bs}
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
theorem ex3 (h : a₁ :: { x := a₂, y := a₃ : Point } :: as = b₁ :: { x := b₂, y := b₃} :: bs) : False := by
grind
def h (a : α) := a
example (p : Prop) (a b c : Nat) : p → a = 0 → a = b → h a = h c → a = c ∧ c = a → a = b ∧ b = a → a = c := by
grind
set_option trace.grind.debug.proof true
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind.1
α : Type
a : α
p q r : Prop
h₁ : p ≍ a
h₂ : q ≍ a
h₃ : p = r
left : p
right : r
⊢ False
[grind] Goal diagnostics
[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] p ≍ a
[prop] q ≍ a
[prop] p = r
[prop] p
[prop] r
[eqc] True propositions
[prop] a
[prop] p
[prop] q
[prop] r
[prop] p = r
[cases] Case analyses
[cases] [1/2]: p = r
[cases] source: Initial goal
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
example (a : α) (p q r : Prop) : (h₁ : p ≍ a) → (h₂ : q ≍ a) → (h₃ : p = r) → False := by
grind
example (a b : Nat) (f : Nat → Nat) : (h₁ : a = b) → (h₂ : f a ≠ f b) → False := by
grind
example (a : α) (p q r : Prop) : (h₁ : p ≍ a) → (h₂ : q ≍ a) → (h₃ : p = r) → q = r := by
grind
/--
trace: [grind.issues] found congruence between
g b
and
f a
but functions have different types
-/
#guard_msgs (trace) in
set_option trace.grind.issues true in
set_option trace.grind.debug.proof false in
example (f : Nat → Bool) (g : Int → Bool) (a : Nat) (b : Int) : f ≍ g → a ≍ b → f a = g b := by
fail_if_success grind
sorry
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind
f : Nat → Bool
g : Int → Bool
a : Nat
b : Int
h : f ≍ g
h_1 : a ≍ b
h_2 : ¬f a = g b
⊢ False
[grind] Goal diagnostics
[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] f ≍ g
[prop] a ≍ b
[prop] ¬f a = g b
[eqc] False propositions
[prop] f a = g b
[eqc] Equivalence classes
[eqc] {f, g}
[eqc] {a, b}
[grind] Issues
[issue] found congruence between
g b
and
f a
but functions have different types
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
example (f : Nat → Bool) (g : Int → Bool) (a : Nat) (b : Int) : f ≍ g → a ≍ b → f a = g b := by
grind