As described at issue #1760, the new error message is: ``` 1760.lean:6:18: error: type mismatch at application f x term x has type big_type : Type 1 but is expected to have type ?m_1 : Type ```
41 lines
1.3 KiB
Text
41 lines
1.3 KiB
Text
elab12.lean:1:33: error: type expected at
|
||
0
|
||
term has type
|
||
ℕ
|
||
elab12.lean:1:41: error: function expected at
|
||
rfl
|
||
term has type
|
||
?m_2 = ?m_2
|
||
Additional information:
|
||
elab12.lean:1:41: context: switched to simple application elaboration procedure because failed to use expected type to elaborate it, error message
|
||
too many arguments
|
||
λ (a : ℕ), have H : ⁇, from ⁇, ⁇ : ∀ (a : ℕ), a = a
|
||
elab12.lean:4:45: error: function expected at
|
||
rfl
|
||
term has type
|
||
?m_2 = ?m_2
|
||
Additional information:
|
||
elab12.lean:4:45: context: switched to simple application elaboration procedure because failed to use expected type to elaborate it, error message
|
||
too many arguments
|
||
elab12.lean:5:2: error: function expected at
|
||
H
|
||
term has type
|
||
a = a
|
||
λ (a : ℕ), have H : a = a, from ⁇, ⁇ : ∀ (a : ℕ), a = a
|
||
elab12.lean:7:47: error: invalid have-expression, term
|
||
a + 0
|
||
has type
|
||
ℕ : Type
|
||
but is expected to have type
|
||
a = a : Prop
|
||
elab12.lean:8:2: error: function expected at
|
||
H
|
||
term has type
|
||
a = a
|
||
λ (a : ℕ), have H : a = a, from ⁇, ⁇ : ∀ (a : ℕ), a = a
|
||
elab12.lean:11:2: error: function expected at
|
||
H
|
||
term has type
|
||
a = a
|
||
λ (a : ℕ), have H : a = a, from rfl, ⁇ : ∀ (a : ℕ), a = a
|
||
λ (a : ℕ), have H : a = a, from rfl, H : ∀ (a : ℕ), a = a
|