272dd5533f
We are considering removing `.` as an alternative for `·` in the lambda dot notation (e.g., `(·+·)`). Reasons: - `.` is not a perfect replacement for `·` (e.g., `(·.insert ·)`) - `.` is too overloaded: `(f.x)` and `(f .x)` and `(f . x)`. We want to keep the first two.
23 lines
914 B
Text
23 lines
914 B
Text
theorem eq_of_isEqvAux [DecidableEq α] (a b : Array α) (hsz : a.size = b.size) (i : Nat) (hi : i ≤ a.size) (heqv : Array.isEqvAux a b hsz (fun x y => x = y) i) : ∀ (j : Nat) (hl : i ≤ j) (hj : j < a.size), a.get ⟨j, hj⟩ = b.get ⟨j, hsz ▸ hj⟩ := by
|
||
intro j low high
|
||
by_cases h : i < a.size
|
||
. unfold Array.isEqvAux at heqv
|
||
simp [h] at heqv
|
||
have hind := eq_of_isEqvAux a b hsz (i+1) (Nat.succ_le_of_lt h) heqv.2
|
||
by_cases heq : i = j
|
||
. subst heq; exact heqv.1
|
||
. exact hind j (Nat.succ_le_of_lt (Nat.lt_of_le_and_ne low heq)) high
|
||
. have heq : i = a.size := Nat.le_antisymm hi (Nat.ge_of_not_lt h)
|
||
subst heq
|
||
exact absurd (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le high low) (Nat.lt_irrefl j)
|
||
termination_by _ => a.size - i
|
||
|
||
@[simp] def f (x y : Nat) : Nat → Nat :=
|
||
if h : x > 0 then
|
||
fun z => f (x - 1) (y + 1) z + 1
|
||
else
|
||
(· + y)
|
||
termination_by
|
||
f x y => x
|
||
|
||
#check f._eq_1
|