lean4-htt/tests/lean/run/ac_expr.lean
Daniel Fabian e1f591ba61 test: do no use unit in ac_expr.lean.
It is not necessary to define a unit element for the proof to go through.
2021-10-02 11:11:08 -07:00

162 lines
5.7 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

import Std
inductive Expr (maxVarId : Nat) : Type where
| var (i : Fin maxVarId)
| op (lhs rhs : Expr maxVarId)
deriving Repr
def List.getIdx : (l : List α) → Fin l.length → α
| [], ⟨_, i⟩ => by
simp [length] at i
apply absurd i
cases i
| a::as, ⟨0, _⟩ => a
| a::as, ⟨i+1, h⟩ => by
apply getIdx as ⟨i, _⟩
simp [List.length_cons] at h
apply Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ
assumption
structure Context (α : Type u) where
op : ααα
assoc : (a b c : α) → op (op a b) c = op a (op b c)
comm : (a b : α) → op a b = op b a
vars : List α
theorem Context.left_comm (ctx : Context α) (a b c : α) : ctx.op a (ctx.op b c) = ctx.op b (ctx.op a c) := by
rw [← ctx.assoc, ctx.comm a b, ctx.assoc]
def Expr.denote (ctx : Context α) : Expr ctx.vars.length → α
| Expr.op a b => ctx.op (denote ctx a) (denote ctx b)
| Expr.var i => ctx.vars.getIdx i
theorem Expr.denote_op (ctx : Context α) (a b : Expr ctx.vars.length) : denote ctx (Expr.op a b) = ctx.op (denote ctx a) (denote ctx b) :=
rfl
def Expr.concat : Expr n → Expr n → Expr n
| Expr.op a b, c => Expr.op a (concat b c)
| Expr.var i, c => Expr.op (Expr.var i) c
theorem Expr.denote_concat (ctx : Context α) (a b : Expr ctx.vars.length) : denote ctx (concat a b) = denote ctx (Expr.op a b) := by
induction a with
| var i => rfl
| op _ _ _ ih => simp [denote, ih, ctx.assoc]
def Expr.flat : Expr n → Expr n
| Expr.op a b => concat (flat a) (flat b)
| Expr.var i => Expr.var i
theorem Expr.denote_flat (ctx : Context α) (e : Expr ctx.vars.length) : denote ctx (flat e) = denote ctx e := by
induction e with
| var i => rfl
| op a b ih₁ ih₂ => simp [flat, denote, denote_concat, ih₁, ih₂]
theorem Expr.eq_of_flat (ctx : Context α) (a b : Expr ctx.vars.length) (h : flat a = flat b) : denote ctx a = denote ctx b := by
have h := congrArg (denote ctx) h
simp [denote_flat] at h
assumption
def Expr.length : Expr n → Nat
| op a b => 1 + b.length
| _ => 1
def Expr.sort (e : Expr n) : Expr n :=
loop e.length e
where
loop : Nat → Expr n → Expr n
| fuel+1, Expr.op a e =>
let (e₁, e₂) := swap a e
Expr.op e₁ (loop fuel e₂)
| _, e => e
swap : Expr n → Expr n → Expr n × Expr n
| Expr.var i, Expr.op (Expr.var j) e =>
if i > j then
let (e₁, e₂) := swap (Expr.var j) e
(e₁, Expr.op (Expr.var i) e₂)
else
let (e₁, e₂) := swap (Expr.var i) e
(e₁, Expr.op (Expr.var j) e₂)
| Expr.var i, Expr.var j =>
if i > j then
(Expr.var j, Expr.var i)
else
(Expr.var i, Expr.var j)
| e₁, e₂ => (e₁, e₂)
theorem Expr.denote_sort (ctx : Context α) (e : Expr ctx.vars.length) : denote ctx (sort e) = denote ctx e := by
apply denote_loop
where
denote_loop (n : Nat) (e : Expr ctx.vars.length) : denote ctx (sort.loop n e) = denote ctx e := by
induction n generalizing e with
| zero => rfl
| succ n ih =>
match e with
| var _ => rfl
| op a b =>
simp [denote, sort.loop]
match h:sort.swap a b with
| (r₁, r₂) =>
have hs := denote_swap a b
rw [h] at hs
simp [denote] at hs
simp [denote, ih]
assumption
denote_swap (e₁ e₂ : Expr ctx.vars.length) : denote ctx (Expr.op (sort.swap e₁ e₂).1 (sort.swap e₁ e₂).2) = denote ctx (Expr.op e₁ e₂) := by
induction e₂ generalizing e₁ with
| op a b ih' ih =>
clear ih'
cases e₁ with
| var i =>
cases a with
| var j =>
byCases h : i > j
focus
simp [sort.swap, h]
match h:sort.swap (var j) b with
| (r₁, r₂) => simp; rw [denote_op (a := var i), ← ih]; simp [h, denote]; rw [Context.left_comm]
focus
simp [sort.swap, h]
match h:sort.swap (var i) b with
| (r₁, r₂) =>
simp
rw [denote_op (a := var i), denote_op (a := var j), Context.left_comm, ← denote_op (a := var i), ← ih]
simp [h, denote]
rw [Context.left_comm]
| _ => rfl
| _ => rfl
| var j =>
cases e₁ with
| var i =>
byCases h : i > j
focus simp [sort.swap, h, denote, Context.comm]
focus simp [sort.swap, h]
| _ => rfl
theorem Expr.eq_of_sort_flat (ctx : Context α) (a b : Expr ctx.vars.length) (h : sort (flat a) = sort (flat b)) : denote ctx a = denote ctx b := by
have h := congrArg (denote ctx) h
simp [denote_flat, denote_sort] at h
assumption
theorem ex₁ (x₁ x₂ x₃ x₄ : Nat) : (x₁ + x₂) + (x₃ + x₄) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃ + x₄ :=
Expr.eq_of_flat
{ op := Nat.add
assoc := Nat.add_assoc
comm := Nat.add_comm
vars := [x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄] }
(Expr.op (Expr.op (Expr.var ⟨0, by simp⟩) (Expr.var ⟨1, by simp⟩)) (Expr.op (Expr.var ⟨2, by simp⟩) (Expr.var ⟨3, by simp⟩)))
(Expr.op (Expr.op (Expr.op (Expr.var ⟨0, by simp⟩) (Expr.var ⟨1, by simp⟩)) (Expr.var ⟨2, by simp⟩)) (Expr.var ⟨3, by simp⟩))
(by rfl)
theorem ex₂ (x₁ x₂ x₃ x₄ : Nat) : (x₁ + x₂) + (x₃ + x₄) = x₃ + x₁ + x₂ + x₄ :=
Expr.eq_of_sort_flat
{ op := Nat.add
assoc := Nat.add_assoc
comm := Nat.add_comm
vars := [x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄] }
(Expr.op (Expr.op (Expr.var ⟨0, by simp⟩) (Expr.var ⟨1, by simp⟩)) (Expr.op (Expr.var ⟨2, by simp⟩) (Expr.var ⟨3, by simp⟩)))
(Expr.op (Expr.op (Expr.op (Expr.var ⟨2, by simp⟩) (Expr.var ⟨0, by simp⟩)) (Expr.var ⟨1, by simp⟩)) (Expr.var ⟨3, by simp⟩))
(by rfl)
#print ex₂