This PR sets up the new integrated test/bench suite. It then migrates all benchmarks and some related tests to the new suite. There's also some documentation and some linting. For now, a lot of the old tests are left alone so this PR doesn't become even larger than it already is. Eventually, all tests should be migrated to the new suite though so there isn't a confusing mix of two systems.
97 lines
3.4 KiB
Text
97 lines
3.4 KiB
Text
theorem tst1 {α : Type} {p : Prop} (xs : List α) (h₁ : (a : α) → (as : List α) → xs = a :: as → p) (h₂ : xs = [] → p) : p :=
|
||
by match (generalizing := false) h : xs with
|
||
| [] => exact h₂ h
|
||
| z::zs => apply h₁ z zs; assumption
|
||
|
||
theorem tst1' {α : Type} {p : Prop} (xs : List α) (h₁ : (a : α) → (as : List α) → xs = a :: as → p) (h₂ : xs = [] → p) : p :=
|
||
by match xs with
|
||
| [] => exact h₂ rfl
|
||
| z::zs => exact h₁ z zs rfl
|
||
|
||
theorem tst2 {α : Type} {p : Prop} (xs : List α) (h₁ : (a : α) → (as : List α) → xs = a :: as → p) (h₂ : xs = [] → p) : p :=
|
||
by match (generalizing := false) h:xs with
|
||
| [] => ?nilCase
|
||
| z::zs => ?consCase;
|
||
case consCase => exact h₁ z zs h;
|
||
case nilCase => exact h₂ h
|
||
|
||
def tst3 {α β γ : Type} (h : α × β × γ) : β × α × γ :=
|
||
by {
|
||
match h with
|
||
| (a, b, c) => exact (b, a, c)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
theorem tst4 {α : Type} {p : Prop} (xs : List α) (h₁ : (a : α) → (as : List α) → xs = a :: as → p) (h₂ : xs = [] → p) : p := by
|
||
match (generalizing := false) h : xs with
|
||
| [] => _
|
||
| z::zs => _
|
||
case match_2 => exact h₁ z zs h
|
||
exact h₂ h
|
||
|
||
theorem tst5 {p q r} (h : p ∨ q ∨ r) : r ∨ q ∨ p:= by
|
||
match h with
|
||
| Or.inl h => exact Or.inr (Or.inr h)
|
||
| Or.inr (Or.inl h) => ?c1
|
||
| Or.inr (Or.inr h) => ?c2
|
||
case c2 =>
|
||
apply Or.inl
|
||
assumption
|
||
case c1 =>
|
||
apply Or.inr
|
||
apply Or.inl
|
||
assumption
|
||
|
||
theorem tst6 {p q r} (h : p ∨ q ∨ r) : r ∨ q ∨ p:= by
|
||
match h with
|
||
| Or.inl h => exact Or.inr (Or.inr h)
|
||
| Or.inr (Or.inl h) => ?c1
|
||
| Or.inr (Or.inr h) =>
|
||
apply Or.inl
|
||
assumption
|
||
case c1 => apply Or.inr; apply Or.inl; assumption
|
||
|
||
theorem tst7 {p q r} (h : p ∨ q ∨ r) : r ∨ q ∨ p:=
|
||
by match h with
|
||
| Or.inl h =>
|
||
exact Or.inr (Or.inr h)
|
||
| Or.inr (Or.inl h) =>
|
||
apply Or.inr;
|
||
apply Or.inl;
|
||
assumption
|
||
| Or.inr (Or.inr h) =>
|
||
apply Or.inl;
|
||
assumption
|
||
|
||
inductive ListLast.{u} {α : Type u} : List α → Type u
|
||
| empty : ListLast []
|
||
| nonEmpty : (as : List α) → (a : α) → ListLast (as ++ [a])
|
||
|
||
axiom last {α} (xs : List α) : ListLast xs
|
||
axiom back {α} [Inhabited α] (xs : List α) : α
|
||
axiom popBack {α} : List α → List α
|
||
axiom backEq {α} [Inhabited α] : (xs : List α) → (x : α) → back (xs ++ [x]) = x
|
||
axiom popBackEq {α} : (xs : List α) → (x : α) → popBack (xs ++ [x]) = xs
|
||
|
||
theorem tst8 {α} [Inhabited α] (xs : List α) : xs ≠ [] → xs = popBack xs ++ [back xs] :=
|
||
match (generalizing := false) xs, h:last xs with
|
||
| _, ListLast.empty => fun h => absurd rfl h
|
||
| _, ListLast.nonEmpty ys y => fun _ => sorry
|
||
|
||
theorem tst9 {α} [Inhabited α] (xs : List α) : xs ≠ [] → xs = popBack xs ++ [back xs] := by
|
||
match (generalizing := false) xs, h:last xs with
|
||
| _, ListLast.empty => intro h; exact absurd rfl h
|
||
| _, ListLast.nonEmpty ys y => intro; rw [popBackEq, backEq]
|
||
|
||
theorem tst8' {α} [Inhabited α] (xs : List α) : xs ≠ [] → xs = popBack xs ++ [back xs] :=
|
||
match xs, last xs with
|
||
| _, ListLast.empty => fun h => absurd rfl h
|
||
| _, ListLast.nonEmpty ys y => fun _ => sorry
|
||
|
||
theorem tst8'' {α} [Inhabited α] (xs : List α) (h : xs ≠ []) : xs = popBack xs ++ [back xs] :=
|
||
match xs, last xs with
|
||
| _, ListLast.empty => absurd rfl h
|
||
| _, ListLast.nonEmpty ys y => sorry
|
||
|
||
example (xs : List α) : xs = xs := by
|
||
match xs with
|
||
| [] | [x] | x::x'::xs => rfl
|