lean4-htt/tests/lean/ppDeepTerms.lean.expected.out
Kyle Miller 3d175ab25f
fix: the elaboration warning did not mention pp.maxSteps (#5710)
This also adds in the tip that hovering over `⋯` gives the option that
led to its presence.
2024-10-14 17:28:28 +00:00

9 lines
848 B
Text

Nat.zero.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ : Nat
Nat.zero.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ : Nat
⋯.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ.succ : Nat
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] : List Nat
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, ⋯] : List Nat
ppDeepTerms.lean:39:32-39:33: warning: The '⋯' token is used by the pretty printer to indicate omitted terms, and it should not be used directly. It logs this warning and then elaborates like '_'.
The presence of '⋯' in pretty printing output is controlled by the 'pp.maxSteps', 'pp.deepTerms' and 'pp.proofs' options. These options can be further adjusted using 'pp.deepTerms.threshold' and 'pp.proofs.threshold'. If this '⋯' was copied from the Infoview, the hover there for the original '⋯' explains which of these options led to the omission.
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, ?m] : List Nat