The notation `a ∈ as` for Arrays was previously only defined with
`DecidableEq` on the elements, for (apparently) no good reason. This
drops this requirements (by using `a ∈ as.data`), and simplifies a bunch
of proofs by simply lifting the corresponding proof from lists.
Also, `sizeOf_lt_of_mem` was defined, but not set up to be picked up by
`decreasing_trivial` in the same way that the corresponding List lemma
was set up, so this adds the tactic setup.
The definition for `a ∈ as` is intentionally not defeq to `a ∈ as.data`
so that the termination tactics for Arrays don’t spuriously apply when
recursing through lists.
f74ae5f9c0