lean4-htt/tests/lean/run/grind_pre.lean
Leonardo de Moura 4955dde748
perf: grind normalizer (#9271)
This PR improves the performance of the formula normalizer used in
`grind`.
2025-07-09 03:49:44 +00:00

216 lines
4.5 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

abbrev f (a : α) := a
set_option grind.debug true
set_option grind.debug.proofs true
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind
a b c : Bool
p q : Prop
left : a = true
right : b = true c = true
left_1 : p
right_1 : q
h_1 : (b && a) = false
⊢ False
[grind] Goal diagnostics
[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] a = true
[prop] b = true c = true
[prop] p
[prop] q
[prop] (b && a) = false
[eqc] True propositions
[prop] p
[prop] q
[prop] b = true c = true
[prop] c = true
[eqc] False propositions
[prop] b = true
[eqc] Equivalence classes
[eqc] {a, c, true}
[eqc] {b, false, b && a}
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
theorem ex (h : (f a && (b || f (f c))) = true) (h' : p ∧ q) : b && a := by
grind
section
attribute [local grind cases eager] Or
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind.2
a b c : Bool
p q : Prop
left : a = true
h_1 : c = true
left_1 : p
right_1 : q
h_2 : (b && a) = false
⊢ False
[grind] Goal diagnostics
[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] a = true
[prop] c = true
[prop] p
[prop] q
[prop] (b && a) = false
[eqc] True propositions
[prop] p
[prop] q
[eqc] Equivalence classes
[eqc] {a, c, true}
[eqc] {b, false, b && a}
[grind] Diagnostics
[cases] Cases instances
[cases] Or ↦ 1
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
theorem ex2 (h : (f a && (b || f (f c))) = true) (h' : p ∧ q) : b && a := by
grind
end
def g (i : Nat) (j : Nat) (_ : i > j := by omega) := i + j
/--
trace: [grind.offset.model] i := 1
[grind.offset.model] j := 0
[grind.offset.model] 「0」 := 0
[grind.offset.model] 「i + j」 := 0
[grind.offset.model] 「i + 1」 := 2
[grind.offset.model] 「i + j + 1」 := 1
-/
#guard_msgs (trace) in
set_option trace.grind.offset.model true in
example (i j : Nat) (h : i + 1 > j + 1) : g (i+1) j = f ((fun x => x) i) + f j + 1 := by
fail_if_success grind
sorry
structure Point where
x : Nat
y : Int
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind
a₁ : Point
a₂ : Nat
a₃ : Int
as : List Point
b₁ : Point
bs : List Point
b₂ : Nat
b₃ : Int
head_eq : a₁ = b₁
h_1 : a₂ = b₂
h_2 : a₃ = b₃
tail_eq_1 : as = bs
⊢ False
[grind] Goal diagnostics
[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] a₁ = b₁
[prop] a₂ = b₂
[prop] a₃ = b₃
[prop] as = bs
[eqc] Equivalence classes
[eqc] {a₁, b₁}
[eqc] {a₂, b₂}
[eqc] {a₃, b₃}
[eqc] {as, bs}
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
theorem ex3 (h : a₁ :: { x := a₂, y := a₃ : Point } :: as = b₁ :: { x := b₂, y := b₃} :: bs) : False := by
grind
def h (a : α) := a
example (p : Prop) (a b c : Nat) : p → a = 0 → a = b → h a = h c → a = c ∧ c = a → a = b ∧ b = a → a = c := by
grind
set_option trace.grind.debug.proof true
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind.1
α : Type
a : α
p q r : Prop
h₁ : p ≍ a
h₂ : q ≍ a
h₃ : p = r
left : p
right : r
⊢ False
[grind] Goal diagnostics
[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] p ≍ a
[prop] q ≍ a
[prop] p = r
[prop] p
[prop] r
[eqc] True propositions
[prop] a
[prop] p
[prop] q
[prop] r
[prop] p = r
[cases] Case analyses
[cases] [1/2]: p = r
[cases] source: Initial goal
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
example (a : α) (p q r : Prop) : (h₁ : p ≍ a) → (h₂ : q ≍ a) → (h₃ : p = r) → False := by
grind
example (a b : Nat) (f : Nat → Nat) : (h₁ : a = b) → (h₂ : f a ≠ f b) → False := by
grind
example (a : α) (p q r : Prop) : (h₁ : p ≍ a) → (h₂ : q ≍ a) → (h₃ : p = r) → q = r := by
grind
/--
trace: [grind.issues] found congruence between
g b
and
f a
but functions have different types
-/
#guard_msgs (trace) in
set_option trace.grind.issues true in
set_option trace.grind.debug.proof false in
example (f : Nat → Bool) (g : Int → Bool) (a : Nat) (b : Int) : f ≍ g → a ≍ b → f a = g b := by
fail_if_success grind
sorry
/--
error: `grind` failed
case grind
f : Nat → Bool
g : Int → Bool
a : Nat
b : Int
h : f ≍ g
h_1 : a ≍ b
h_2 : ¬f a = g b
⊢ False
[grind] Goal diagnostics
[facts] Asserted facts
[prop] f ≍ g
[prop] a ≍ b
[prop] ¬f a = g b
[eqc] False propositions
[prop] f a = g b
[eqc] Equivalence classes
[eqc] {f, g}
[eqc] {a, b}
[grind] Issues
[issue] found congruence between
g b
and
f a
but functions have different types
-/
#guard_msgs (error) in
example (f : Nat → Bool) (g : Int → Bool) (a : Nat) (b : Int) : f ≍ g → a ≍ b → f a = g b := by
grind