lean4-htt/tests/lean/run/postponeBinRelIssue.lean
Kim Morrison 3a457e6ad6
chore: use #guard_msgs in run tests (#4175)
Many of our tests in `tests/lean/run/` produce output from `#eval` (or
`#check`) statements, that is then ignored.

This PR tries to capture all the useful output using `#guard_msgs`. I've
only done a cursory check that the output is still sane --- there is a
chance that some "unchecked" tests have already accumulated regressions
and this just cements them!

In the other direction, I did identify two rotten tests:
* a minor one in `setStructInstNotation.lean`, where a comment says `Set
Nat`, but `#check` actually prints `?_`. Weird?
* `CompilerProbe.lean` is generating empty output, apparently indicating
that something is broken, but I don't know the signficance of this file.

In any case, I'll ask about these elsewhere.

(This started by noticing that a recent `grind` test file had an
untested `trace_state`, and then got carried away.)
2024-05-16 00:38:31 +00:00

15 lines
615 B
Text

def as := [-1, 2, 0, -3, 4]
#guard as.map (fun a => ite (GE.ge a 0) [a] []) == [[], [2], [0], [], [4]]
-- Used to fail if we use `withSynthesize` instead of `withSynthesizeLight` at `elabBinRel`
#guard as.map (fun a => ite (a ≥ 0) [a] []) = [[], [2], [0], [], [4]]
example : True :=
/-
Requires type annotation at the numeral, otherwise we get a type error at `rfl`
because `(0 == 1)` does not reduce to `false` until the default instance is applied.
Possible improvement: before reporting a type mismatch, apply default instances, and try again.
-/
have : (0 == (1 : Nat)) = false := rfl
⟨⟩