lean4-htt/tests/elab/1158.lean
Sebastian Ullrich db6aa9d8d3
feat: move instance-class check to declaration site (#12325)
This PR adds a warning to any `def` of class type that does not also
declare an appropriate reducibility.

The warning check runs after elaboration (checking the actual
reducibility status via `getReducibilityStatus`) rather than
syntactically checking modifiers before elaboration. This is necessary
to accommodate patterns like `@[to_additive (attr :=
implicit_reducible)]` in Mathlib, where the reducibility attribute is
applied during `.afterCompilation` by another attribute, and would be
missed by a purely syntactic check.

---------

Co-authored-by: Paul Reichert <6992158+datokrat@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <kim@tqft.net>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-06 03:23:27 +00:00

70 lines
1.8 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

set_option warn.classDefReducibility false
class magma (α) where op : ααα
infix:70 " ⋆ " => magma.op (self := inferInstance)
class leftIdMagma (α) extends magma α where
identity : α
id_op (a : α) : identity ⋆ a = a := by intros; rfl
class rightIdMagma (α) extends magma α where
identity : α
op_id (a : α) : a ⋆ identity = a := by intros; rfl
class semigroup (α) extends magma α where
assoc (a b c : α) : (a ⋆ b) ⋆ c = a ⋆ (b ⋆ c) := by intros; rfl
class idMagma (α) extends leftIdMagma α, rightIdMagma α
class monoid (α) extends idMagma α, semigroup α
def magmaMonoid : leftIdMagma (base → base) := {
op := Function.comp
identity := id
}
def fnCompMonoid : monoid (base → base) := {
op := Function.comp, identity := id
}
namespace Ex2
structure A (α) where
subsingleton : ∀ a b : α, a = b := by assumption
structure B (α) where
op : ααα
idempotent : ∀ a : α, op a a = a := by assumption
fav : α := by assumption
structure C (α) where
op : ααα
comm : ∀ a b : α, op a b = op b a := by assumption
structure D (α) extends A α, B α
structure E (α) extends C α, B α
-- Let's reuse these
theorem s (a b : Unit) : a = b := rfl
def op (_ _ : Unit) : Unit := ()
def i (a : Unit) : op a a = a := s _ a
def c (a b : Unit) : op a b = op b a := s _ _
-- Successfully defined
def d : D Unit := have := s; have := i; have := ()
{ op }
def e : E Unit := have := c; have := i; have := ()
{ op }
structure F (α) extends D α, E α
structure G (α) extends E α, D α
def f : F Unit := have := s; have := i; have := c; have := ()
{ op }
-- `idempotent`, `fav` missing
def g : G Unit := have := s; have := i; have := c; have := ()
{ op }
end Ex2