Commit graph

24655 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Daniel Fabian
371504e9cf feat: add ProofBelow construction for inductive predicates.
This construction allows us to define `brecOn` for inductive predicates.
2021-04-25 20:02:22 -07:00
Sebastian Ullrich
53b0e7dde8 fix: ban tabs
Fixes #339
2021-04-25 19:55:15 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
2cbdd637c7 test: add second example for issue #423 2021-04-25 10:35:23 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
b670d6b8d7 test: for issue #423 2021-04-25 10:30:26 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
675bebb446 fix: isLevelDefEq missing case 2021-04-25 10:27:14 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
0533fc4056 chore: fix test 2021-04-25 10:25:35 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
d68d1f0841 fix: fixes #423 2021-04-25 10:00:38 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
67f007fb51 feat: improve error message 2021-04-25 09:59:32 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
96b987c366 chore: update stage0 2021-04-24 22:23:57 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
f47f605039 fix: remove incorrect test
It had two problems:
- It was preventing coercions from being applied.
- It was compromising error recovery. The body of the lambda was not
being elaborated when the exception was thrown.

The new error message is more verbose and potentially confusing, but
it is better than the one produced this morning.
2021-04-24 22:17:29 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
1f9975d35d feat: improve error message and include variables introduced by the implicit lambda notation 2021-04-24 21:34:42 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
10185d24dd feat: improve error message 2021-04-24 20:43:13 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
a6888f72dd fix: instance + where + implicts issue
The following could not be elaborated.

```lean
instance : MulComm Bool where
  mulComm := fun {a b} =>
    match a, b with
    | true, true   => rfl
    | true, false  => rfl
    | false, true  => rfl
    | false, false => rfl
```
2021-04-24 20:07:35 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
2ff8052ce4 fix: missing do 2021-04-24 19:40:40 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
cf734814fd chore: update stage0 2021-04-24 19:36:58 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
c76820a251 fix: no method lift over let 2021-04-24 19:33:55 -07:00
Sebastian Ullrich
01f6cece2f chore: fix parser error message 2021-04-24 21:48:12 +02:00
Sebastian Ullrich
069bcf8933 fix: restore missing invariant 2021-04-24 21:46:48 +02:00
Leonardo de Moura
a076b5b89e feat: improved error recovery for interpolated strings 2021-04-24 10:24:57 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
74d613ab88 fix: safe instance for MethodsRef 2021-04-24 07:24:08 -07:00
Sebastian Ullrich
d15e2b3756 refactor: make notation and macro macros again 2021-04-24 11:25:08 +02:00
Leonardo de Moura
04f3bd1423 chore: update stage0 2021-04-23 19:42:15 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
b2190da468 feat: add Macro.resolveGlobalName and Macro.resolveNamespace? 2021-04-23 19:38:56 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
d70f9c232c feat: trace support for MacroM
closes #184
2021-04-23 19:15:14 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
5c6b13ef9a feat: MonadTrace instance for CommandElabM 2021-04-23 18:49:56 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
c6e00aba63 chore: finalize Macro.Methods refactoring
We can now add new methods without using `update-stage0` multiple times.
2021-04-23 18:08:44 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
7b42588909 chore: update stage0 2021-04-23 18:04:15 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
d1dcf0b067 chore: cleanup
We still need another update stage0
2021-04-23 18:02:50 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
fe9cb0b5ed chore: update stage0 2021-04-23 17:52:44 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
9552b6c95f feat: add Macro.hasDecls and Macro.getCurrNamespace
We need update stage0, and cleanup
2021-04-23 17:51:28 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
0838b95105 chore: add Macro.State.Extra 2021-04-23 16:22:32 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
1151ef9af0 chore: add Macro.Methods 2021-04-23 16:22:32 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
a5d1b8f3c5 chore: add Macro.State 2021-04-23 16:22:24 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
030f53fa43 fix: closes #421
The unifier used to implement the `cases` tactic should not discard
equations of the form `x = t` and `t = x` using proof irrelanvance.
The new test demonstrates the issue. The unifier was reaching the
state
```
x : Conw Con.nil
|- x = Conw.nilw -> x = Conw.nilw
```
and discarding the equality instead of substituting `x`
because `x` and `Conw.nilw` are definionally equal due to
proof irrelevance.

@javra Do you have more complicated examples that were being
affected by this issue?
2021-04-23 12:27:39 -07:00
Sebastian Ullrich
bf5b403bea doc: update dbg_trace docs 2021-04-23 15:48:43 +02:00
Sebastian Ullrich
0e3db5b98b refactor: simplify & generalize runCommandElabM 2021-04-23 15:26:49 +02:00
Sebastian Ullrich
ccb873cea2 fix: panic on variable : 2021-04-23 09:24:35 +02:00
Leonardo de Moura
104b51471c chore: fix warning 2021-04-22 20:38:57 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
df665bc219 chore: remove leftover 2021-04-22 20:34:52 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
c0da331e02 chore: remove temp code 2021-04-22 20:32:24 -07:00
Sebastian Ullrich
8895ed47e5 refactor: clean up Thunk
Fixes a bug in the native implementation of `Thunk.bind` by deleting it
2021-04-22 20:29:08 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
964fd3f520 chore: fixes tests
closes #405
2021-04-22 20:22:43 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
25144dc91a chore: update stage0 2021-04-22 20:06:26 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
3a80e87793 chore: #405 step 1 2021-04-22 20:03:48 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
e6e12ca408 fix: fixes #408 2021-04-22 19:07:03 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
cebc301c11 chore: remove old test 2021-04-22 18:14:18 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
61259697bd chore: update stage0 2021-04-22 18:02:47 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
39abe04e67 chore: remove dead code 2021-04-22 18:00:06 -07:00
Sebastian Ullrich
20cbb4389a fix: Nix: VS Code override 2021-04-21 12:21:02 +02:00
Leonardo de Moura
e593987d3c chore: update stage0 2021-04-19 18:58:02 -07:00