This PR adds the combinator ` · t_1 ... t_n` to the `grind` interactive
mode. The `finish?` tactic now generates scripts using this combinator
to conform to Mathlib coding standards. The new format is also more
compact. Example:
```lean
/--
info: Try this:
[apply] ⏎
instantiate only [= mem_indices_of_mem, insert, = getElem_def]
instantiate only [= getElem?_neg, = getElem?_pos]
cases #f590
· cases #ffdf
· instantiate only
instantiate only [= Array.getElem_set]
· instantiate only
instantiate only [size, = HashMap.mem_insert, = HashMap.getElem_insert, = Array.getElem_push]
· instantiate only [= mem_indices_of_mem, = getElem_def]
instantiate only [usr getElem_indices_lt]
instantiate only [size]
cases #ffdf
· instantiate only [=_ WF]
instantiate only [= getElem?_neg, = getElem?_pos, = Array.getElem_set]
instantiate only [WF']
· instantiate only
instantiate only [= HashMap.mem_insert, = HashMap.getElem_insert, = Array.getElem_push]
-/
#guard_msgs in
example (m : IndexMap α β) (a a' : α) (b : β) (h : a' ∈ m.insert a b) :
(m.insert a b)[a'] = if h' : a' == a then b else m[a'] := by
grind => finish?
```
This PR ensures that model-based theory combination in `grind cutsat`
considers nonlinear terms. Nonlinear multiplications such as `x * y` are
treated as uninterpreted symbols in `cutsat`.
Closes#10885
This PR adds support for scientific literals for `Rat` in `grind`.
`grind` does not yet add support for this kind of literal in arbitrary
fields.
closes#10489
This PR fixes a bug in the equality propagation procedure in
`grind.order`. Specifically, it affects the procedure that asserts
equalities in the `grind` core state that are implied by (ring)
inequalities in the `grind.order` module.
closes#10622
This PR adds the `mbtc` tactic to the `grind` interactive mode. It
implements model-based theory combination. It also ensures `finish?` is
capable of generating it.
This PR ensures that solver propagation steps are necessary in the
generated tactic script to close the goal.
It produces more compact proof scripts, but this is not just an
optimization, if we include an unnecessary step, we may fail to replay
the generated script when `cases` steps are pruned using
non-chronological backtracking (NCB). For example, when executing
`finish?`, we may have performed a `cases #<anchor>` step that enabled
`ring` to propagate a new fact. If this fact is not used in the final
proof, and the corresponding `cases #<anchor>` step is pruned by NCB,
the `ring` step will fail during replay.
This PR ensures that `finish?` produces partial tactic scripts
containing `sorry`s.
We may add an option to disable this feature in the future.
It is enabled by default because it provides a useful way to debug
`grind` failures.
This PR topologically sorts abstracted vars in
`Meta.Closure.mkValueTypeClosure` if MVars are being abstracted.
Fixes#10705
---------
Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <efw@google.com>
This PR fixes a regression introduced by the `ST` redefinition by making
the definition of `ST` as
reducible as previously. The key issue here is that in the previous
state it would reduce to a
function at which point the monad lifting mechanisms don't kick in in
the same fashion anymore.
This PR fixes another instance of the “default parameter value in
constructor” footgun, which was affecting the `cases` tactic in the
`grind` interactive mode.
This PR fixes name mangling to be unambiguous / injective by adding `00`
for disambiguation where necessary. Additionally, the inverse function,
`Lean.Name.unmangle` has been added which can be used to unmangle a
mangled identifier. This unmangler has been added to demonstrate the
injectivity but also to allow unmangling identifiers e.g. for debugging
purposes.
Closes#10724
This PR adds support for `grind +premises`, calling the currently
configured premise selection algorithm and including the results as
parameters to `grind`. (Recall that there is not currently a default
premise selector provided by Lean4: you need a downstream premise
selector to make use of this.)
This PR implements the `have <ident>? : <prop>` tactic for the `grind`
interactive mode. The proposition is proved using the default `grind`
search strategy. This tactic is also useful for inspecting or querying
the current `grind` state.
This PR implements parameter optimization for the generated
`instantiate` tactics produced by `finish?`.
We use a simple parameter optimizer that takes two sets as input: the
lower and upper bounds.
The lower bound consists of the theorems actually used in the proof
term, while the upper bound includes all the theorems instantiated in a
particular theorem instantiation step.
The lower bound is often sufficient to replay the proof, but in some
cases, additional theorems must be included because a theorem
instantiation may contribute to the proof by providing terms and many
not be present in the final proof term.
This PR implements zero cost `BaseIO` by erasing the `IO.RealWorld`
parameter from argument lists and structures. This is a **major breaking
change for FFI**.
Concretely:
- `BaseIO` is defined in terms of `ST IO.RealWorld`
- `EIO` (and thus `IO`) is defined in terms of `EST IO.RealWorld`
- The opaque `Void` type is introduced and the trivial structure
optimization updated to account for it. Furthermore, arguments of type
`Void s` are removed from the argument lists of the C functions.
- `ST` is redefined as `Void s -> ST.Out s a` where `ST.Out` is a pair
of `Void s` and `a`
This together has the following major effects on our generated code:
- Functions that return `BaseIO`/`ST`/`EIO`/`IO`/`EST` now do not take
the dummy world parameter anymore. To account for this FFI code needs to
delete the dummy world parameter from the argument lists.
- Functions that return `BaseIO`/`ST` now return their wrapped value
directly. In particular `BaseIO UInt32` now returns a `uint32_t` instead
of a `lean_object*`. To account for this FFI code might have to change
the return type and does not need to call `lean_io_result_mk_ok` anymore
but can instead just `return` values right away (same with extracting
values from `BaseIO` computations.
- Functions that return `EIO`/`IO`/`EST` now only return the equivalent
of an `Except` node which reduces the allocation size. The
`lean_io_result_mk_ok`/`lean_io_result_mk_error` functions were updated
to account for this already so no change is required.
Besides improving performance by dropping allocation (sizes) we can now
also do fun new things such as:
```lean
@[extern "malloc"]
opaque malloc (size : USize) : BaseIO USize
```
This PR fixes a proof instability source in `grind`.
We say a proof is *unstable* if minor changes in the `.lean` file
containing the proof **affect** it.
This PR improves the performance of `mvcgen` by an optimized
implementation for `try (mpure_intro; trivial)`. This tactic sequence is
used to eagerly discharge VCs and in the process instantiates schematic
variables.
This PR renames `String.endPos` to `String.rawEndPos`, as in a future
release the name `String.endPos` will be taken by the function that is
currently called `String.endValidPos`.
This PR fixes a bug in `String.Slice.takeWhile` which caused it to get
its bookkeeping wrong and panic. The new version only uses safe
operations on `String.Slice.Pos`.
This PR shows that the iterators returned by `String.Slice.split` and
`String.Slice.splitInclusive` are finite as long as the forward matcher
iterator for the pattern is finite (which we already know for all of our
patterns).
At actually also completely redefines the iterators to avoid the inner
loop in `Internal.nextMatch` which generates inefficient code. Instead,
when encountering a mismach from the matcher, we `skip` the split
iterator.
This PR improves the `grind` tactic generated by the `instantiate`
action in tracing mode. It also updates the syntax for the `instantiate`
tactic, making it similar to `simp`. For example:
* `instantiate only [thm1, thm2]` instantiates only theorems `thm1` and
`thm2`.
* `instantiate [thm1, thm2]` instantiates theorems marked with the
`@[grind]` attribute **and** theorems `thm1` and `thm2`.
The action produces `instantiate only [...]` tactics. Example:
```lean
/--
info: Try this:
[apply] ⏎
instantiate only [= Array.getElem_set]
instantiate only [= Array.getElem_set]
-/
#guard_msgs in
example (as bs cs : Array α) (v₁ v₂ : α)
(i₁ i₂ j : Nat)
(h₁ : i₁ < as.size)
(h₂ : bs = as.set i₁ v₁)
(h₃ : i₂ < bs.size)
(h₄ : cs = bs.set i₂ v₂)
(h₅ : i₁ ≠ j ∧ i₂ ≠ j)
(h₆ : j < cs.size)
(h₇ : j < as.size) :
cs[j] = as[j] := by
grind => finish?
```
Recall that `finish?` replays generated tactics before suggesting them.
The `instantiate` action inspects the generated proof term to decide
which theorems to include as parameters in the `instantiate only [...]`
tactic. However, in some cases, a theorem contributes only by adding a
term to the state. In such cases, the generated tactic cannot be fully
replayed, and the action uses
`instantiate approx [<thms instantiated>]` to indicate which parts of
the tactic script are approximate. The `approx` is just a hint for
users.
This PR implements the `finish?` tactic for the `grind` interactive
mode. When it successfully closes the goal, it produces a code action
that allows the user to close the goal using explicit grind tactic
steps, i.e., without any search. It also makes explicit which solvers
have been used.
This is just the first version, we will add many "bells and whistles"
later. For example, `instantiate` steps will clearly show which theorems
have been instantiated.
Example:
```lean
/--
info: Try this:
[apply] ⏎
cases #b0f4
next => cases #50fc
next => cases #50fc <;> lia
-/
#guard_msgs in
example (p : Nat → Prop) (x y z w : Int) :
(x = 1 ∨ x = 2) →
(w = 1 ∨ w = 4) →
(y = 1 ∨ (∃ x : Nat, y = 3 - x ∧ p x)) →
(z = 1 ∨ z = 0) → x + y ≤ 6 := by
grind => finish?
```
The anchors in the generated script are based on stable hash codes.
Moreover, users can hover over them to see the exact term used in the
case split. `grind?` will also be implemented using the new framework.
This PR implements a compact notation for inspecting the `grind` state
in interactive mode. Within a `grind` tactic block, each tactic may
optionally have a suffix of the form `| filter?`.
Examples:
```lean
instantiate | gen > 0 -- Displays terms in the `grind` state after executing `instantiate` with generation greater than zero
```
```lean
instantiate | -- Displays the `grind` state after executing `instantiate`
```
Remark: If the user places the cursor one space before `|`, the state
*before* executing `instantiate` is displayed.
This PR removes the code that was silently displaying the `grind` state
after each tactic step, as it was too noisy.
It also updates the notation for the `first` combinator in the `grind`
tactic mode to avoid conflicts with the new syntax.
This PR changes match compilation to reject some pattern matches that
were previously accepted due to inaccessible patterns sometimes treated
like accessible ones. Fixes#10794.
