This PR changes the order of steps tried when proving equational
theorems for structural recursion. In order to avoid goals that `split`
cannot handle, avoid unfolding the LHS of the equation to `.brecOn` and
`.rec` until after the RHS has been split into its final cases.
Fixes: #10195
This PR lets the `split` tactic generalize discriminants that are not
free variables and proofs using `generalize`. If the only
non-fvar-discriminants are proofs, then this avoids the more elaborate
generalization strategy of `split`, which can fail with dependent
motives, thus mitigating issue #10424.
This PR changes the defeq algorithm to perform `whnf` on the `String.mk`
expression it creates for string literals.
This is currently a no-op, but will no longer be one once `String` is
redefined so that `String.mk` is a regular function instead of a
constructor.
This PR implements the new E-matching pattern inference heuristic for
`grind`. It is not enabled yet. You can activate the new behavior using
`set_option backward.grind.inferPattern false`. Here is a summary of the
new behavior.
* `[grind =]`, `[grind =_]`, `[grind _=_]`, `[grind <-=]`: no changes;
we keep the current behavior.
* `[grind ->]`, `[grind <-]`, `[grind =>]`, `[grind <=]`: we stop using
the *minimal indexable subexpression* and instead use the first
indexable one.
* `[grind! <mod>]`: behaves like `[grind <mod>]` but uses the minimal
indexable subexpression restriction. We generate an error if the user
writes `[grind! =]`, `[grind! =_]`, `[grind! _=_]`, or `[grind! <-=]`,
since there is no pattern search in these cases.
* `[grind]`: it tries `=`, `=_`, `<-`, `->`, `<=`, `=>` with and without
the minimal indexable subexpression restriction. For the ones that work,
we generate a code action to encourage users to select the one they
prefer.
* `[grind!]`: it tries `<-`, `->`, `<=`, `=>` using the minimal
indexable subexpression restriction. For the ones that work, we generate
a code action to encourage users to select the one they prefer.
* `[grind? <mod>]`: where `<mod>` is one of the modifiers above, it
behaves like `[grind <mod>]` but also displays the pattern.
Example:
```lean
/--
info: Try these:
• [grind =] for pattern: [f (g #0)]
• [grind =_] for pattern: [r #0#0]
• [grind! ←] for pattern: [g #0]
-/
#guard_msgs in
@[grind] axiom fg₇ : f (g x) = r x x
```
This PR adds a normalizer for non-commutative semirings to `grind`.
Examples:
```lean
open Lean.Grind
variable (R : Type u) [Semiring R]
example (a b c : R) : a * (b + c) = a * c + a * b := by grind
example (a b : R) : (a + 2 * b)^2 = a^2 + 2 * a * b + 2 * b * a + 4 * b^2 := by grind
example (a b : R) : b^2 + (a + 2 * b)^2 = a^2 + 2 * a * b + b * (1+1) * a * 1 + 5 * b^2 := by grind
example (a b : R) : a^3 + a^2*b + a*b*a + b*a^2 + a*b^2 + b*a*b + b^2*a + b^3 = (a+b)^3 := by grind
```
This PR adds the helper theorem `eq_normS_nc` for normalizing
non-commutative semirings. We will use this theorem to justify
normalization steps in the `grind ring` module.
This PR changes the automation in `deriving_LawfulEq_tactic_step` to use
`with_reducible` when asserting the shape of the goal using `change`, so
that we do not accidentally unfold `x == x'` calls here. Fixes#10416.
This PR adds the ability to do `deriving ReflBEq, LawfulBEq`. Both
classes have to listed in the `deriving` clause. For `ReflBEq`, a simple
`simp`-based proof is used. For `LawfulBEq`, a dedicated,
syntax-directed tactic is used that should work for derived `BEq`
instances. This is meant to work with `deriving BEq` (but you can try to
use it on hand-rolled `@[methods_specs] instance : BEq…` instances).
Does not support mutual or nested inductives.
This PR fixes a bug where definitions with nested proofs that contain
`sorry` might not report "warning: declaration uses 'sorry'" if the
proof has the same type as another nested proof from a previous
declaration. The bug only affected log messages; `#print axioms` would
still correctly report uses of `sorryAx`.
The fix is that now the abstract nested proofs procedure does not
consult the aux lemma cache if the proof contains a `sorry`.
Closes#10196
This PR gives anonymous constructor notation (`⟨x,y⟩`) an error recovery
mechanism where if there are not enough arguments then synthetic sorries
are inserted for the missing arguments and an error is logged, rather
than outright failing.
Closes#9591.
This PR fixes an issue with the `if` tactic where errors were not placed
at the correct source ranges. It also adds some error recovery to avoid
additional errors about unsolved goals on the `if` token when the tactic
has incomplete syntax.
Closes#7972
This PR adds the `reduceBEq` and `reduceOrd` simprocs. They rewrite
occurrences of `_ == _` resp. `Ord.compare _ _` if both arguments are
constructors and the corresponding instance has been marked with
`@[method_specs]` (introduced in #10302), which now by default is the
case for derived instances.
This PR introduces the `@[specs]` attribute. It can be applied to
(certain) type class instances and define “specification theorems” for
the class’ operations, by taking the equational theorems of the
implementation function mentioned in the type class instance and
rephrasing them in terms of the overloaded operations. Fixes#5295.
Example:
```
inductive L α where
| nil : L α
| cons : α → L α → L α
def L.beqImpl [BEq α] : L α → L α → Bool
| nil, nil => true
| cons x xs, cons y ys => x == y && L.beqImpl xs ys
| _, _ => false
@[method_specs] instance [BEq α] : BEq (L α) := ⟨L.beqImpl⟩
/--
info: theorem instBEqL.beq_spec_2.{u_1} : ∀ {α : Type u_1} [inst : BEq α] (x_2 : α) (xs : L α) (y : α) (ys : L α),
(L.cons x_2 xs == L.cons y ys) = (x_2 == y && xs == ys)
-/
#guard_msgs(pass trace, all) in
#print sig instBEqL.beq_spec_2
```
It also introduces the `method_specs_norm` simpset to allow registering
further normalization of the theorems. The intended use of this is to
rewrite, say, `Append.append` to the `HAppend.hAppend` (i.e. `++`) that
the user wants to see. Library annotations to follow in a separate PR.
This PR makes the builtin Verso docstring elaborators bootstrap
correctly, adds the ability to postpone checks (which is necessary for
resolving forward references and bootstrapping issues), and fixes a
minor parser bug.
This PR includes some improvements to the release process, making the
updating of `stable` branches more robust, and including `cslib` in the
release checklist.
This PR implements sanity checks in the `grind ring` module to ensure
the instances synthesized by type class resolution are definitionally
equal to the corresponding ones in the `grind` core classes. The
definitional equality test is performed with reduction restricted to
reducible definitions and instances.
This PR fixes an issue where the "eta feature" in the app elaborator,
which is invoked when positional arguments are skipped due to named
arguments, results in variables that can be captured by those named
arguments. Now the temporary local variables that implement this feature
get fresh names. The names used for the closed lambda expression still
use the original parameter names.
Closes#6373
