This implements a naive version of `getline` because Windows does not
have `getline`. Given the fact that `FILE` has buffered IO, calling
`fgetc` in a loop is not as big of a performance hazard as it might seem
at first glance.
The proper solution to this would of course be to have our own buffered
IO so we are fully in charge of the buffer. In this situation we could
check the entire buffer for a newline at once instead of char by char.
However that is not going to happen for the near future so I propose we
stay with this implementation. If reading individual lines of a file
does truly end up being the performance bottle neck we have already
won^^.
This change canonicalizes the BitVec variable names to `x y z : BitVec`
instead of alternative namings such as `s t : BitVec` or `a b : BitVec`.
Variable names that carry semantic meaning such as `(msbs : BitVec w)
(lsb : Bool)` remain untouched.
This is purely a naming change to make our bitvector proofs more
consistent and polish the (auto-generated) documentation as a very small
step towards polishing the documentation of the BitVec library in Lean.
---------
Co-authored-by: AnotherAlexHere <153999274+AnotherAlexHere@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR:
- changes the implementation of `readBinFile` and `readFile` to only
require two system calls (`stat` + `read`) instead of one `read` per
1024 byte chunk.
- fixes a bug where `Handle.getLine` would get tripped up by a NUL
character in the line and cut the string off. This is caused by the fact
that the original implementation uses `strlen` and `lean_mk_string`
which is the backer of `mk_string` does so as well.
- fixes a bug where `Handle.putStr` and thus by extension `writeFile`
would get tripped up by a NUL char in the line and cut the string off.
Cause here is the use of `fputs` when a NUL char is possible.
Closes: #4891Closes: #3546Closes: #3741
For experimentation by @the-sofi-uwu.
I also have an efficient number parser in LeanSAT that I am planning to
upstream after we have sufficiently bikeshed this change.
This modification improves the performance of the example in issue
#4861. It no longer times out but is still expensive.
Here is the analysis of the performance issue: Given `(x : Int)`, to
elaborate `x ^ 1`, a few default instances have to be tried.
First, the homogeneous instance is tried and fails since `Int` does not
implement `Pow Int`. Then, the `NatPow` instance is tried, and it also
fails. The same process is performed for each term of the form `p ^ 1`.
There are seveal of them at #4861. After all of these fail, the lower
priority default instance for numerals is tried, and `x ^ 1` becomes `x
^ (1 : Nat)`. Then, `HPow Int Nat Int` can be applied, and the
elaboration succeeds. However, this process has to be repeated for every
single term of the form `p ^ 1`. The elaborator tries all homogeneous
`HPow` and `NatPow` instances for all `p ^ 1` terms before trying the
lower priority default instance `OfNat`.
This commit ensures `Int` has a `NatPow` instance instead of `HPow Int
Nat Int`. This change shortcuts the process, but it still first tries
the homogeneous `HPow` instance, fails, and then tries `NatPow`. The
elaboration can be made much more efficient by writing `p ^ (1 : Nat)`.
This allows bitblasting `BitVec.replicate`.
I changed the definition of `BitVec.replicate` to use `BitVec.cast` in
order to make the proof smoother, since it's an easier time simplifying
away terms with `BitVec.cast`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Tobias Grosser <tobias@grosser.es>
This is part 2 of 2 of #4801 (which closes#4654). That PR was split in
two to allow a stage0 update between declaring the `usize` functions and
using them where they are needed.
Add efficient `usize` functions for `Array`, `ByteArray`, `FloatArray`.
This is part 1 of 2 since there is a need to update stage0 between the
two parts. (See discussion below.)
Closes#4654
Now it suggests using `@[ext (iff := false)]` to disable generating the
`ext_iff` lemma.
This PR also adjusts error messages and attribute documentation.
Additionally, to simplify the code now the `x` and `y` arguments can't
come in reverse order (this feature was was added in the refactor
#4543).
Closes#4758
A more restrictive but efficient max sharing primitive.
**Motivation:** Some software verification proofs may contain
significant redundancy that can be eliminated using hash-consing (also
known as `shareCommon`). For example, [theorem
`sha512_block_armv8_test_4_sym`](460fe5d74c/Proofs/SHA512/SHA512Sym.lean (L29))
took a few seconds at [`addPreDefinitions`
](1a12f63f74/src/Lean/Elab/PreDefinition/Main.lean (L155))
and one second at `fixLevelParams` on a MacBook Pro (with M1 Pro). The
proof term initially had over 16 million subterms, but the redundancy
was indirectly and inefficiently eliminated using `Core.transform` at
`addPreDefinitions`. I tried to use `shareCommon` method to fix the
performance issue, but it was too inefficient. This PR introduces a new
`shareCommon'` method that, although less flexible (e.g., it uses only a
local cache and hash-consing table), is much more efficient. The new
procedure minimizes the number of RC operations and optimizes the
caching strategy. It is 20 times faster than the old `shareCommon`
procedure for theorem `sha512_block_armv8_test_4_sym`.
