It currently only reports how many times each declaration has been
unfolded, and how often the `isDefEq` heuristic for `f a =?= f b` has
been used. Only counters above the threshold are reported.
The subst notation substitues in the expected type, if present, or in
the type of the argument, if no expected type is known.
If there is an expected type it already fails if it cannot find the
equations' left hand side or right hand side. But if the expected type
is not known and the equation's lhs is not present in the second
argument's type, it will happily do a no-op-substitution.
This is inconsistent and unlikely what the user intended to do, so we
now print an error message now.
This still only looks for the lhs; search for the rhs as well seems
prudent, but I’ll leave that for a separate PR, to better diagnose the
impact on mathlib.
This triggers a small number of pointless uses of subst in mathlib, see
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/12451
We add a new configuration flag for `isDefEq`:
`Meta.Config.univApprox`.
When it is true, we approximate the solution for universe constraints
such as
- `u =?= max u ?v`, we use `?v := u`, and ignore the solution `?v := 0`.
- `max u v =?= max u ?w`, we use `?w := v`, and ignore the solution `?w
:= max u v`.
We only apply these approximations when there the contraints cannot be
postponed anymore. These approximations prevent error messages such as
```
error: stuck at solving universe constraint
max u ?u.3430 =?= u
```
This kind of error seems to appear in several Mathlib files.
We currently do not use these approximations while synthesizing type
class instances.
`Name.append` has special handling of macro scopes, and it would cause
`unresolveNameGlobal` to panic. Using `Name.appendCore` to append name
parts is justified by the fact that it's being used to reassemble a
disassembled name.
Closes#2291
Adds `ppLevel` to the `PPFns` extension so that the coercion can pass
the pretty printing context (including the `pp.mvars` option setting) to
the `Level` formatter.
Previously the `ac_rfl` tactic was only really usable when depending on
mathlib. With these instances, `ac_rfl` can deal with the various
operations defined in Lean.
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
This makes `exact?%` behave like `by exact?` rather than `by apply?`.
If the underlying function `librarySearch` finds a suggestion which
closes the goal, use it (and add a code action). Otherwise log an error
and use `sorry`. The error is either
```text
`exact?%` didn't find any relevant lemmas
```
or
```text
`exact?%` could not close the goal. Try `by apply` to see partial suggestions.
```
---
[Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Useful.20term.20elaborators/near/434863856)
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
<!--
# Read this section before submitting
* Ensure your PR follows the [External Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md).
* Please make sure the PR has excellent documentation and tests. If we
label it `missing documentation` or `missing tests` then it needs
fixing!
* Include the link to your `RFC` or `bug` issue in the description.
* If the issue does not already have approval from a developer, submit
the PR as draft.
* The PR title/description will become the commit message. Keep it
up-to-date as the PR evolves.
* If you rebase your PR onto `nightly-with-mathlib` then CI will test
Mathlib against your PR.
* You can manage the `awaiting-review`, `awaiting-author`, and `WIP`
labels yourself, by writing a comment containing one of these labels on
its own line.
* Remove this section, up to and including the `---` before submitting.
-->
See RFC #3644 for a discussion of design choices.
Closes#3644
Currently this will fail in two tests, because of changes in #3965.
* Sometimes we need to add an additional universe annotation, or we get
a `stuck at solving universe constraint max u ?u =?= u`.
* Sometimes we need to specify arguments that could previously be found
by unification.
---------
Co-authored-by: Leonardo de Moura <leomoura@amazon.com>
Complement to #3967 , adds a `(since := "<date>")` field to
`@[deprecated]` so that metaprogramming code has access to the
deprecation date for e.g. bulk removals. Also adds `@[deprecated
"deprecation message"]` to optionally replace the default text
"`{declName}` has been deprecated, use `{newName}` instead".
Adds a `--json` option to the `lean` CLI. When used, the Lean frontend
will print messages as JSON objects using the default `ToJson` encoding
for the `Message` structure. This allows consumers (such as Lake) to
handle Lean output in a more intelligent, well-structured way.
`Message` has been refactored into `BaseMessage`, `Message`, and
`SerialMessage` to enable deriving `ToJson`/ `FromJson` instances
automatically for `BaseMessage` / `SerialMessage`. `SerialMessage` is a
`Message` with its `MessageData` eagerly serialized to a `String`.
- [x] Depends on: #3958
- [x] Depends on: #3960
This makes the UTF-8 encode and decode functions have lean definitions,
so that we can prove properties about them downstream.
previously, the empty `MessageData` (`m!""`) was used to indicate “no
message”, and `throwTacticEx` would format the message differently then.
But the semantics of `MessageData.isEmpty` isn't entirely clear in the
presence of lazy message data (e.g. `.ofPPFormat`).
So to avoid wondering what `isEmpty` should do there, let's simply use
an optional argument to `throwTacticEx` and get rid of
`MessageData.isEmpty`.
This reduces the number of reimplemented functions which complicate
proofs. After inlining it ends up the same as before.
`ltOfOrd` is also changed to use `compare a b = .lt` instead of
`(compare a b == .lt) = true`, for consistency with the normal form in
std.
Rather than adding symm hypotheses to the local context, it now adds
them to the list of hypotheses derived from the local context.
This is not ideal for performance reasons, but it at least closes#3922.
In the future, solveByElim could maintain its own cache of facts that it
updates whenever it does intro.
This PR partly addresses #3458, by adding an option `autoPromoteIndices`
to turn off the promotion of fixed indices to parameters. The actual fix
for the issue is in a separate PR #3591.
Because nested inductive datatypes parameters cannot contain local
variables, it is often desirable for a fixed index to not be promoted,
as to allow free variables in that place. See example in `3458_1.lean`
This is intended to fail at present: it just adds a test case containing
a minimization of a Mathlib slowdown from #3807.
Prior to #3807, the declaration `exists_algHom_adjoin_of_splits'''` at
the end of the file would take around 16,000 heartbeats. Now it takes
around 210,000 heartbeats.
---------
Co-authored-by: Leonardo de Moura <leomoura@amazon.com>
Previously, there was a function `opaque fromUTF8Unchecked : ByteArray
-> String` which would convert a list of bytes into a string, but as the
name implies it does not validate that the string is UTF-8 before doing
so and as a result it produces unsound results in the compiler (because
the lean model of `String` indirectly asserts UTF-8 validity). This PR
replaces that function by
```lean
opaque validateUTF8 (a : @& ByteArray) : Bool
opaque fromUTF8 (a : @& ByteArray) (h : validateUTF8 a) : String
```
so that while the function is still "unchecked", we have a proof witness
that the string is valid. To recover the original, actually unchecked
version, use `lcProof` or other unsafe methods to produce the proof
witness.
Because this was the only `ByteArray -> String` conversion function, it
was used in several places in an unsound way (e.g. reading untrusted
input from IO and treating it as UTF-8). These have been replaced by
`fromUTF8?` or `fromUTF8!` as appropriate.
