ac_nf is a counterpart to ac_rfl, which normalizes bitvector expressions
with respect to associativity and commutativity.
While there, also add test coverage for ac_rfl and ac_nf for BitVec,
complementing the existing test coverage.
The lemma `exists_const` already handles all real cases of `(∃ _ : α, p)
↔ p` for general types `α`. If there are no `Nonempty` instances and
this lemma cannot apply, it seems unlikely that simp could make more
progress with `(∃ _ : α, p) ↔ Nonempty α ∧ p`.
However, it is still worth simplifying `(∃ _ : p, q)` to `p ∧ q`.
Also adds a `Nonempty (Decidable a)` instance, which is used by Mathlib.
…|twoPow|one|replicate]
... and mark `getElem_setWidth` as `@[simp]`.
`getElem_rotateLeft` and `getElem_rotateRight` have a non-trivial rhs
but we follow `getLsbD_[rotateLeft|rotateRight]`for consistency.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <scott@tqft.net>
Adds Reservoir as another possible source of build caches in addition to
GitHub releases. If a GitHub release is not configured for a Reservoir
dependency, it will attempt download a build cache from Reservoir. Like
with GitHub releases, failure will not stop the build and instead issue
a warning. Many of the Lake API calls related to these build caches were
refactored and renamed, with the old names remaining around as
deprecated aliases.
Build cache downloads (from Reservoir or GitHub) can now be disabled via
the `--no-cache` CLI option or the `LAKE_NO_CACHE` environment variable.
A disabled cache can be re-enable with the `--try-cache` CLI option.
Macros sometimes create auxiliary types and instances about them, and
they rely on the instance name generate to create unique names in that
case.
This modifies the automatic name generator to add a fresh macro scope to
the generated name if any of the constants in the type of the instance
themselves have macro scopes.
Closes#2044
Generally works best to pick up the proofs by unification with the lhs.
pinging @hargoniX as this goes by, as it changes some proofs in
bv_decide (nothing interesting, just a bit simpler)
@bollu, it would be good to have confirmation from you, but presumably
this was not meant to be `@[simp]`? It competes with `divRec_succ`, and
has a terrible RHS.
after this change, `simp` will be able to discharge side-goals that,
after simplification, are of the form `∀ …, a = b` with `a =?= b`.
Usually these side-goals are solved by simplification using `eq_self`,
but that does not work when there are metavariables involved.
This enables us to have rewrite rules like
```
theorem List.foldl_subtype (p : α → Prop) (l : List (Subtype p)) (f : β → Subtype p → β)
(g : β → α → β) (b : β)
(hf : ∀ b x h, f b ⟨x, h⟩ = g b x) :
l.foldl f b = (l.map (·.val)).foldl g b := by
```
where the parameter `g` does not appear on the lhs, but can be solved
for using the `hf` equation. See `tests/lean/run/simpHigherOrder.lean`
for more examples.
The motivating use-case is that `simp` should be able to clean up the
usual
```
l.attach.map (fun <x, _> => x)
```
idiom often seen in well-founded recursive functions with nested
recursion.
Care needs to be taken with adding such rules to the default simp set if
the lhs is very general, and thus causes them to be tried everywhere.
Performance impact of just this PR (no additional simp rules) on mathlib
is unsuspicious:
http://speed.lean-fro.org/mathlib4/compare/b5bc44c7-e53c-4b6c-9184-bbfea54c4f80/to/ae1d769b-2ff2-4894-940c-042d5a698353
I tried a few alternatives, e.g. letting `simp` apply `eq_self` without
bumping the mvar depth, or just solve equalities directly, but that
broke too much things, and adding code to the default discharger seemed
simpler.
The formatter was using `tk ++ " "` to separate tokens from tokens they
would merge with, but `" "` is not whitespace that could merge. This
affected large binder lists, which wouldn't pretty print with any line
breaks. Now they can be flowed across multiple lines.
Closes#5424
Just an `Array` version of `List.eraseReps`. These functions are for now
outside of scope for verification, so there's just a simple `example` in
the tests.
Now the elab-as-elim procedure allows eliminators whose result is an
arbitrary application of the motive. For example, the following is now
accepted. It will generalize `Int.natAbs _` from the expected type.
```lean
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem natAbs_elim {motive : Nat → Prop} (i : Int)
(hpos : ∀ (n : Nat), i = n → motive n)
(hneg : ∀ (n : Nat), i = -↑n → motive n) :
motive (Int.natAbs i) := by sorry
```
This change simplifies the elaborator, since it no longer needs to keep
track of discriminants (which can easily be read off from the return
type of the eliminator) or the difference between "targets" and "extra
arguments" (which are now both "major arguments" that should be eagerly
elaborated).
Closes#4086
`BitVec.Lemmas` contained a couple of non-terminal simps. We turn
non-terminal `simp$`, `simp [`, and `simp at` expressions into `simp
only` to improve code maintainability.
This was upstreamed from Mathlib in #5478, but leaving off the `@[simp]`
attribute, thereby breaking Mathlib. (We could of course add the simp
attribute back in Mathlib, but wherever it lives it should have been in
place at the time we merged -- this way I have to add it temporarily in
Mathlib and then remove it again once it is redundant.)
Recall that currently named arguments suppress all explicit parameters
that are dependencies. This PR limits this feature to only apply to true
structure projections, except in the case where it is triggered when
there are no more positional arguments. This preserves the primary
reason for generalizing this feature (issue #1851), while removing the
generalized feature, which has led to numerous confusions (issue #1867).
This also fixes a bug pointed out [on
Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/.40foo.20.28A.20.3A.3D.20bar.29.20_.20_/near/468564862)
where in `@` mode, instance implicit parameter dependencies to named
arguments would be suppressed unless the next positional argument was
`_`.
More detail:
* The `NamedArg` structure now has a `suppressDeps : Bool` field. It is
set to `true` for the `self` argument in structure projections. If there
is such a `NamedArg`, explicit parameters that are dependencies to the
named argument are turned into implicit arguments. The consequence is
that *all* structure projections are treated as if their type parameters
are implicit, even for class projections. This flag is *not* used for
generalized field notation.
* We preserve the suppression feature when there are no positional
arguments remaining. This feature pre-dates the fix to issue #1851, and
it is useful when combining named arguments and the eta expansion
feature, since dependencies of named arguments cannot be turned into eta
arguments. Plus, there are examples of the form `rw [lem (h := foo)]`
where `lem` has explicit arguments that `h` depends on.
* For instance implicit parameters in explicit mode, now `_` arguments
register terminfo and are hoverable.
* Now `..` is respected in explicit mode.
This implements RFC #5397. The `suppressDeps` flag suggests a future
possibility of a named argument syntax that can suppress dependencies.
Adds a mechanism where when an autoparam tactic fails to synthesize a
parameter, the associated parameter name or field name for the autoparam
is reported in an error.
Examples:
```text
could not synthesize default value for parameter 'h' using tactics
could not synthesize default value for field 'inv' of 'S' using tactics
```
Notes:
* Autoparams now run their tactics without any error recovery or
error-to-sorry enabled. This enables catching the error and reporting
the contextual information. This is justified on the grounds that
autoparams are not interactive.
* Autoparams for applications now cleanup the autoParam annotation,
bringing it in line with autoparams for structure fields.
* This preserves the old behavior that autoparams leave terminfo, but we
will revisit this after some imminent improvements to the unused
variable linter.
Closes#2950
`elabEvalUnsafe` already does something similar: it also instantiates
universe metavariables, but it is not clear to me whether that is
sensible here.
To be conservative, I leave it out of this PR.
See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3090#discussion_r1432007590
for a comparison between `#eval` and `Meta.evalExpr`. This PR is not
trying to fully align them, but just to fix one particular misalignment
that I am impacted by.
Closes#3091
