This PR properly spells out the trace nodes in bv_decide so they are
visible with just `trace.Meta.Tactic.bv` and `trace.Meta.Tactic.sat`
instead of always having to enable the profiler.
* `--profile` now reports `blocking` time spent in `Task.get` inside
other profiling categories
* environment variable `LEAN_TRACE_TASK_GET_BLOCKED` when set makes
`lean` dump stack traces of `Task.get` blocks
This PR replaces various `HashMap.get_X` with `getElem_X` versions. Now
the left hand sides are in simp normal form (and this fixes some
confluence problems).
This PR implements basic support for handling of enum inductives in
`bv_decide`. It now supports equality on enum inductive variables (or
other uninterpreted atoms) and constants.
This PR adds `simp +arith` for integers. It uses the new `grind`
normalizer for linear integer arithmetic. We still need to implement
support for dividing the coefficients by their GCD. It also fixes
several bugs in the normalizer.
This PR implements the normalizer for linear integer arithmetic
expressions. It is not connect to `simp +arith` yet because of some
spurious `[simp]` attributes.
This PR modifies the `Prop` docstring to point out that every
proposition is propositionally equal to either `True` or `False`. This
will help point users toward seeing that `Prop` is like `Bool`.
I considered mentioning `Classical.propComplete`, but it's probably
better not making it seem like that's how you should work with
propositions.
This PR changes the error message for Lake configuration failure to
reflect that issues do not always arise from an invalid lakefile, but
sometimes arise from other issues like network errors. The new error
message encompasses all of these possibilities.
Closes#6827
This PR avoids a `let` in the elaboration of `forIn`. It was introduced
in https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/commit/f51328ff112 but nothing
seems to break when I simplify the code. This removes an unexpected `let
col✝ :=…` from the “Expected type” view in the Info View and from the
termination proofs.
This PR adds the `Try.Config.merge` flag (`true` by default) to the
`try?` tactic. When set to `true`, `try?` compresses suggestions such
as:
```lean
· induction xs, ys using bla.induct
· grind only [List.length_reverse]
· grind only [bla]
```
into:
```lean
induction xs, ys using bla.induct <;> grind only [List.length_reverse, bla]
```
This PR also ensures `try?` does not generate suggestions that mixes
`grind` and `grind only`, or `simp` and `simp only` tactics.
This PR also adds the `try? +harder` option (previously called `lib`),
but it has not been fully implemented yet.
This PR enables the language server to present multiple disjoint line
ranges as being worked on. Even before parallelism lands, we make use of
this feature to show post-elaboration tasks such as kernel checking on
the first line of a declaration to distinguish them from the final
tactic step.
This PR extends the behavior of the `sync` flag for `Task.map/bind` etc.
to encompass synchronous execution even when they first have to wait on
completion of the first task, drastically lowering the overhead of such
tasks. Thus the flag is now equivalent to e.g. .NET's
`TaskContinuationOptions.ExecuteSynchronously`.
This PR adds new configuration options to `try?`.
- `try? -only` omits `simp only` and `grind only` suggestions
- `try? +missing` enables partial solutions where some subgoals are
"solved" using `sorry`, and must be manually proved by the user.
- `try? (max:=<num>)` sets the maximum number of suggestions produced
(default is 8).
This PR adds support for more complex suggestions in `try?`. Example:
```lean
example (as : List α) (a : α) : concat as a = as ++ [a] := by
try?
```
suggestion
```
Try this: · induction as, a using concat.induct
· rfl
· simp_all
```
This PR fixes a bug where both the inlay hint change invalidation logic
and the inlay hint edit delay logic were broken in untitled files.
Thanks to @Julian for spotting this!
This PR implements a number of refinements for the auto-implicit inlay
hints implemented in #6768.
Specifically:
- In #6768, there was a bug where the inlay hint edit delay could
accumulate on successive edits, which meant that it could sometimes take
much longer for inlay hints to show up. This PR implements the basic
infrastructure for request cancellation and implements request
cancellation for semantic tokens and inlay hints to resolve the issue.
With this edit delay bug fixed, it made more sense to increase the edit
delay slightly from 2000ms to 3000ms.
- In #6768, we applied the edit delay to every single inlay hint request
in order to reduce the amount of inlay hint flickering. This meant that
the edit delay also had a significant effect on how far inlay hints
would lag behind the file progress bar. This PR adjusts the edit delay
logic so that it only affects requests sent directly after a
corresponding `didChange` notification. Once the edit delay is used up,
all further semantic token requests are responded to without delay, so
that the only latency that affects how far the inlay hints lag behind
the progress bar is how often we emit refresh requests and how long VS
Code takes to respond to them.
- For inlay hints, refresh requests are now emitted 500ms after a
response to an inlay hint request, not 2000ms, which means that after
the edit delay, inlay hints should only lag behind the progress bar by
about up to 500ms. This is justifiable for inlay hints because the
response should be much smaller than e.g. is the case for semantic
tokens.
- In #6768, 'Restart File' did not prompt a refresh, but it does now.
- VS Code does not immediately remove old inlay hints from the document
when they are applied. In #6768, this meant that inlay hints would
linger around for a bit once applied. To mitigate this issue, this PR
adjusts the inlay hint edit delay logic to identify edits sent from the
client as being inlay hint applications, and sets the edit delay to 0ms
for the inlay hint requests following it. This means that inlay hints
are now applied immediately.
- In #6768, hovering over single-letter auto-implicit inlay hints was a
bit finicky because VS Code uses the regular cursor icon on inlay hints,
not the thin text cursor icon, which means that it is easy to put the
cursor in the wrong spot. We now add the separation character (` ` or
`{`) preceding an auto-implicit to the hover range as well, which makes
hovering over inlay hints much smoother.
As per dicussion with team colleages, the feature shouldn’t be called
“auto attach” but rather “well-founded recursion preprocessing” to avoid
(imprecise) jargon.
This PR adds the `binderNameHint` gadget. It can be used in rewrite and
simp rules to preserve a user-provided name where possible.
The expression `binderNameHint v binder e` defined to be `e`.
If it is used on the right-hand side of an equation that is applied by a
tactic like `rw` or `simp`,
and `v` is a local variable, and `binder` is an expression that (after
beta-reduction) is a binder
(so `fun w => …` or `∀ w, …`), then it will rename `v` to the name used
in the binder, and remove
the `binderNameHint`.
A typical use of this gadget would be as follows; the gadget ensures
that after rewriting, the local
variable is still `name`, and not `x`:
```
theorem all_eq_not_any_not (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
l.all p = !l.any fun x => binderNameHint x p (!p x) := sorry
example (names : List String) : names.all (fun name => "Waldo".isPrefixOf name) = true := by
rw [all_eq_not_any_not]
-- ⊢ (!names.any fun name => !"Waldo".isPrefixOf name) = true
```
This gadget is supported by `simp`, `dsimp` and `rw` in the
right-hand-side of an equation, but not
in hypotheses or by other tactics.
This PR ensures `try?` can suggest tactics that need to reference
inaccessible local names.
Example:
```lean
/--
info: Try these:
• · expose_names; induction as, bs_1 using app.induct <;> grind [= app]
• · expose_names; induction as, bs_1 using app.induct <;> grind only [app]
-/
#guard_msgs (info) in
example : app (app as bs) cs = app as (app bs cs) := by
have bs := 20 -- shadows `bs` in the target
try?
```
