195 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
195 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
master branch (aka work in progress branch)
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
*Features*
|
|
|
|
* In addition to user-defined notation parsers introduced in Lean 3.2.0, users may now also define top-level commands in Lean. For an example, see the [`coinductive` command](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/blob/814a5edaf172c3835c000e3f631bddd85bd879ab/library/init/meta/coinductive_predicates.lean#L551-L552) that has been ported to the new model.
|
|
|
|
* Add new simplifier configuration option `simp_config.single_pass`. It is useful for simplification rules that may produce non-termination.
|
|
Example: `simp {single_pass := tt}`
|
|
|
|
* The rewrite tactic has support for equational lemmas. Example: Given a definition `f`, `rw [f]` will try to rewrite the goal using the equational lemmas for `f`.
|
|
The tactic fails if none of the equational lemmas can be used.
|
|
|
|
* Add `simp * at *` variant. It acts on all (non dependent propositional) hypotheses.
|
|
Simplified hypotheses are automatically inserted into the simplification set
|
|
as additional simplification rules.
|
|
|
|
* Add `«id»` notation that can be used to declare and refer to identifiers containing prohibited characters.
|
|
For example, `a.«b.c»` is a two-part identifier with parts `a` and `b.c`.
|
|
|
|
* `simp` tactic now handles lemmas with metavariables. Example `simp [add_comm _ b]`.
|
|
|
|
* `conv { ... }` tactic for applying simplification and rewriting steps.
|
|
In the block `{...}`, we can use tactics from `conv.interactive`.
|
|
Examples:
|
|
- `conv at h in (f _ _) { simp }` applies `simp` to first subterm matching `f _ _` at hypothesis `h`.
|
|
- `conv in (_ = _) { to_lhs, whnf }` replace the left-hand-side of the equality in target with its weak-head-normal-form.
|
|
- `conv at h in (0 + _) { rw [zero_add] }`
|
|
- `conv { for (f _ _) [1, 3] {rw [h]}, simp }`, first execute `rw[h]` to the first and third occurrences of an `f`-application,
|
|
and then execute `simp`.
|
|
|
|
* `simp` tactics in interactive mode have a new configuration parameter (`discharger : tactic unit`)
|
|
a tactic for discharging subgoals created by the simplifier. If the tactic fails, the simplifier
|
|
tries to discharge the subgoal by reducing it to `true`.
|
|
Example: `simp {discharger := assumption}`.
|
|
|
|
* `simp` and `dsimp` can be used to unfold projection applications when the argument is a type class instance.
|
|
Example: `simp [has_add.add]` will replace `@has_add.add nat nat.has_add a b` with `nat.add a b`
|
|
|
|
* `dsimp` has several new configuration options to control reduction (e.g., `iota`, `beta`, `zeta`, ...).
|
|
|
|
* Non-exhaustive pattern matches now show missing cases.
|
|
|
|
*Changes*
|
|
|
|
* We now have two type classes for converting to string: `has_to_string` and `has_repr`.
|
|
The `has_to_string` type class in v3.2.0 is roughly equivalent to `has_repr`.
|
|
For more details, see discussion [here](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/pull/1664).
|
|
|
|
* Merged `assert` and `note` tactics and renamed -> `have`.
|
|
|
|
* Renamed `pose` tactic -> `let`
|
|
|
|
* `assume` is now a real tactic that does not exit tactic mode.
|
|
|
|
* Modified `apply` tactic configuration object, and implemented [RFC #1342](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/issues/1342). It now has support for `auto_param` and `opt_param`. The new `eapply` tactic only creates subgoals for non dependent premises, and it simulates the behavior of the `apply` tactic in version 3.2.0.
|
|
|
|
* Add configuration object `rewrite_cfg` to `rw`/`rewrite` tactic. It now has support for `auto_param` and `opt_param`.
|
|
The new goals are ordered using the same strategies available for `apply`.
|
|
|
|
* All `dsimp` tactics fail if they did not change anything.
|
|
We can simulate the v3.2.0 using `dsimp {fail_if_unchaged := ff}` or `try dsimp`.
|
|
|
|
* `dsimp` does not unfold reducible definitions by default anymore.
|
|
Example: `function.comp` applications will not be unfolded by default.
|
|
We should use `dsimp [f]` if we want to reduce a reducible definition `f`.
|
|
Another option is to use the new configuration parameter `unfold_reducible`.
|
|
Example `dsimp {unfold_reducible := tt}`
|
|
|
|
* All `dunfold` and `unfold` tactics fail if they did not unfold anything.
|
|
We can simulate the v3.2.0 using `unfold f {fail_if_unchaged := ff}` or `try {unfold f}`.
|
|
|
|
* `dunfold_occs` was deleted, the new `conv` tactical should be used instead.
|
|
|
|
* `unfold` tactic is now implemented on top of the `simp` tactics. So, we can use it to unfold
|
|
declarations defined using well founded recursion. The `unfold1` variant does not unfold recursively,
|
|
and it is shorthand for `unfold f {single_pass := tt}`.
|
|
Remark: in v3.2.0, `unfold` was just an alias for the `dunfold` tactic.
|
|
|
|
* Deleted `simph` and `simp_using_hs` tactics. We should use `simp [*]` instead.
|
|
|
|
* Use `simp [-h]` and `dsimp [-h]` instead of `simp without h` and `dsimp without h`.
|
|
Moreover, `simp [*, -h]` if `h` is a hypothesis, we are adding all hypotheses but `h`
|
|
as additional simplification lemmas.
|
|
|
|
* Changed notation `rw [-h]` to `rw [← h]` to avoid confusion with the new `simp [-h]` notation.
|
|
The ASCII version `rw [<- h]` is also supported.
|
|
|
|
* Removed the redundant keywords `take` (replace with `assume`) and `suppose` (replace with the new anonymous `assume :`)
|
|
|
|
* Universes `max u v + 1` and `imax u v + 1` are now parsed as `(max u v) + 1` and `(imax u v) + 1`.
|
|
|
|
*API name changes*
|
|
|
|
* `list.dropn` => `list.drop`
|
|
* `list.taken` => `list.take`
|
|
* `tactic.dsimp` and `tactic.dsimp_core` => `tactic.dsimp_target`
|
|
* `tactic.dsimp_at_core` and `tactic.dsimp_at` => `tactic.dsimp_hyp`
|
|
* `tactic.delta_expr` => `tactic.delta`
|
|
* `tactic.delta` => `tactic.delta_target`
|
|
* `tactic.delta_at` => `tactic.delta_hyp`
|
|
* `tactic.simplify_goal` => `tactic.simp_target`
|
|
* `tactic.unfold_projection` => `tactic.unfold_proj`
|
|
* `tactic.unfold_projections_core` => `tactic.unfold_projs`
|
|
* `tactic.unfold_projections` => `tactic.unfold_projs_target`
|
|
* `tactic.unfold_projections_at` => `tactic.unfold_projs_hyp`
|
|
* `tactic.simp_intros_using`, `tactic.simph_intros_using`, `tactic.simp_intro_lst_using`, `tactic.simph_intro_lst_using` => `tactic.simp_intros`
|
|
* `tactic.simp_at` => `tactic.simp_hyp`
|
|
* deleted `tactic.simp_at_using`
|
|
* deleted `tactic.simph_at`
|
|
|
|
v3.2.0 (18 June 2017)
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
Lean is still evolving rapidly, and we apologize for the resulting instabilities. The lists below summarizes some of the new features and incompatibilities with respect to release 3.1.0.
|
|
|
|
*Features*
|
|
|
|
* Holes `{! ... !}` expressions and (user-defined) hole commands.
|
|
In Emacs, hole commands are executed using the keybinding C-c SPC.
|
|
The available commands can be found [here](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/blob/master/library/init/meta/hole_command.lean).
|
|
|
|
* The `leanpkg` package manager now manages projects and dependencies. See the documentation [here](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/tree/master/leanpkg). Parts of the standard library, like the superposition theorem prover `super`, have been moved to their own repositories. `.project` files are no longer needed to use `emacs` with projects.
|
|
|
|
* Well-founded recursion is now supported. (Details and examples for this and the next two items will soon appear in _Theorem Proving in Lean_.)
|
|
|
|
* Mutually (non meta) recursive definitions are now supported.
|
|
|
|
* Nested and mutual inductive data types are now supported.
|
|
|
|
* There is support for coinductive predicates.
|
|
|
|
* The `simp` tactic has been improved and supports more options, like wildcards. Hover over `simp` in an editor to see the documentation string (docstring).
|
|
|
|
* Additional interactive tactics have been added, and can be found [here](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/blob/master/library/init/meta/interactive.lean).
|
|
|
|
* A `case` tactic can now be used to structure proofs by cases and by induction. See [here](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/pull/1515).
|
|
|
|
* Various data structures, such as hash maps, have been added to the standard library [here](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/tree/master/library/data).
|
|
|
|
* There is preliminary support for user-defined parser extensions. More information can be found [here](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/pull/1617), and some examples can be found [here](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/blob/814a5edaf172c3835c000e3f631bddd85bd879ab/library/init/meta/interactive_base.lean#L184-L215).
|
|
|
|
* Numerous improvements have been made to the parallel compilation infrastructure and editor interfaces, for example, as described [here](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/pull/1405) and [here](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/pull/1534).
|
|
|
|
* There is a `transfer` method that can be used to transfer results e.g. to isomorphic structures; see [here](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/pull/1435).
|
|
|
|
* The monadic hierarchy now includes axioms for monadic classes. (See [here](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/pull/1485).)
|
|
|
|
* The tactic notation `tac ; [tac_1, ..., tac_n]` has been added.
|
|
|
|
* The type classes `has_well_founded`, `has_map`, `has_seq`, `has_orelse` have been added.
|
|
|
|
* Type classes can have input/output parameters. Some examples can be found [here](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/blob/master/library/init/core.lean).
|
|
|
|
* `tactic.run_io` can now be used to perform IO in tactics.
|
|
|
|
*Changes*
|
|
|
|
* Type class instances are not `[reducible]` by default anymore.
|
|
|
|
* Commands that produce output are now preceded by a hash symbol, as in `#check`, `#print`, `#eval` and `#reduce`. The `#eval` command calls the bytecode evaluator, and `#reduce` does definitional reduction in the kernel. Many instances of alternative syntax like `premise` for `variable` and `hypothesis` for `parameter` have been eliminated. See the discussion [here](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/issues/1432).
|
|
|
|
* The hierarchy of universes is now named `Sort 0`, `Sort 1`, `Sort 2`, and so on. `Prop` is alternative syntax for `Sort 0`, `Type` is alternative syntax for `Sort 1`, and `Type n` is alternative syntax for `Sort (n + 1)`. Many general constructors have been specialized from arbitrary `Sort`s to `Type` in order to simplify elaboration.
|
|
|
|
* Automatically generate dependent eliminators for inductive predicates.
|
|
|
|
* Improve unification hint matcher.
|
|
|
|
* Improve unifier. In function applications, explicit arguments are unified before implicit ones.
|
|
Moreover, more aggresive unfolding is used when processing implicit arguments.
|
|
|
|
* Use `universe u` instead of `universe variable u` to declare a universe variable.
|
|
|
|
* The syntax `l^.map f` for projections is now deprecated in favor of `l.map f`.
|
|
|
|
* The behavior of the `show` tactic in interactive tactic mode has changed. It no longer leaves tactic mode. Also, it can now be used to select a goal other than the current one.
|
|
|
|
* The `assertv` and `definev` tactics have been eliminated in favor of `note` and `pose`.
|
|
|
|
* `has_andthen` type class is now heterogeneous,
|
|
|
|
* The encoding of structures has been changed, following the strategy described [here](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/wiki/Refactoring-structures). Generic operations like `add` and `mul` are replaced by `has_add.add` and `has_mul.mul`, respectively. One can provisionally obtain the old encodings with `set_option old_structure_cmd true
|
|
`.
|
|
|
|
* Syntax for quotations in metaprograms has changed. The notation `` `(t)`` elaborates `t` at definition time and produces an expression. The notation ``` ``(t) ``` resolves names at definition time produces a pre-expression, and ```` ```(t)```` resolves names at tactic execution time, and produces a pre-expression. Details can be found in the paper Ebner et al, _A Metaprogramming Framework for Formal Verification_.
|
|
|
|
* The types `expr` for expressions and `pexpr` for pre-expressions have been unified, so that `pexpr` is defined as `expr ff`. See [here](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/pull/1580).
|
|
|
|
* Handling of the `io` monad has changed. Examples can be found [here](https://github.com/leanprover/lean/tree/master/leanpkg/leanpkg) in the code for `leanpkg`, which is written in Lean itself.
|
|
|
|
- `state` and `state_t` are universe polymorphic.
|
|
|
|
* GCC 7 compatibility
|
|
|
|
* Use single quotes for character literals (e.g., 'a').
|