Leonardo de Moura eef60279e4 tests(tests/playground/expr_const_folding): another example for the paper ... @kha I implemented a more complex example for the paper. The difference in performance is awesome. On my Linux desktop: Lean time: 3.34 secs OCaml time: 11.72 secs I believe that the difference in performance is due to destructive updates happening in transformation functions such as `reassoc` and `const_folding`. I will add a flag to Lean to disable `reuse/reset` automatic insertion. BTW, this test requires `ulimit -s unlimited` to avoid stack overflows.		2019-02-15 12:07:52 -08:00
..
compiler	fix(tests/compiler/t2): pause at the end	2019-02-14 10:44:59 -08:00
ir	refactor(library/system/io): move into init	2018-08-21 08:43:09 -07:00
lean	feat(library/init/lean/frontend): rework error reporting	2019-02-12 13:34:32 +01:00
playground	tests(tests/playground/expr_const_folding): another example for the paper	2019-02-15 12:07:52 -08:00